User talk:Betacommand: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:24, 9 July 2010 editClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,373,198 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Betacommand/20100701. (BOT)← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:08, 11 July 2010 edit undoBetacommand (talk \| contribs)86,927 edits This is no longer true as it has expiredNext edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}
	{{User:Betacommand/Status}}		{{User:Betacommand/Status}}
	<sup><small>
	<div align="right"><sub>{{Age in days\|month2=7\|day2=11\|year2=2010}}<br/>{{Age in days\|month2=1\|day2=11\|year2=2010}}<br/>{{Age in days\|month2=1\|day2=24\|year2=2010}}</sub></div>
	</small></sup>
	{{cmbox\|type=content\|image=]\|text='''Note from Betacommand's mentor:''' If you have a concern or problem with something Betacommand has done, and/or you feel he has broken his editing restrictions (), please make an effort to discuss the situation with Betacommand and/or one or both of his mentors, {{user\|Hersfold}} and {{user\|MBisanz}}, ''before'' taking or requesting administrative action. Taking this step can greatly reduce the drama levels normally associated with this sort of concern, and is much more likely to come up with a result that leaves everyone happy.

	In severe cases, blocks may of course be administered prior to warnings as per the blocking policy, however it is the responsibilities of the assigned mentors to oversee Betacommand's conduct. Outside of egregious violations, it would be preferred that discussion be attempted first, or that requests for administrative action be directed to the mentors. Thank you. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 03:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)}}
	{{user talk:Betacommand/archives}}		{{user talk:Betacommand/archives}}

Revision as of 12:08, 11 July 2010

I am currently busy