| Revision as of 01:58, 30 January 2006 view sourceJtkiefer (talk | contribs)9,299 edits italicizing quote← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:05, 30 January 2006 view source Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs)4,471 edits adding note to all usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ''Note to other users: Please do not remove the following rant. It serves as a testament to this user's harassment towards me.'' | |||
| == well == | == well == | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 30 January 2006
Note to other users: Please do not remove the following rant. It serves as a testament to this user's harassment towards me.
well
What do you think you're doing? The next time you revert my edits to my own talk page I'll file an RFC. How dare you accuse me of "abusing" my powers. What planet are you on? Have you not seen Radiant's poll in which a majority of users have said the rollback is for any revert? Don't bother me with this again. freestylefrappe 01:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Well I take pleasure in the fact that your days of abusing your admin powers are gonna be at an end as soon as the arbcom wraps up your arbcom case. Oh and unlike you I follow policy not dinky little polls and I'm not the one who's about to have his admin powers stripped for abusing his powers so stay either shape up or STFU. Jtkiefer ---- 01:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)