Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:09, 30 January 2006 editHargreavesfan (talk | contribs)27 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 22:10, 30 January 2006 edit undoHargreavesfan (talk | contribs)27 edits []Next edit →
Line 54: Line 54:
#] 19:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC) #] 19:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
#] ] (]) 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC) #] ] (]) 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
#] 22:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
; '''Comments:''' ; '''Comments:'''
:I've been grinding my way through the German clubs alphabetically, using the available ], and doing what I can to flesh out the articles for each team with re-writes, additional info, logos, that sort of thing. Done about three dozen sides so far – into the G's – but have only touched on a couple of the big clubs to date. Werder and Alemannia, I think. Freshened up the article on the ], too. On a first pass through, I've been focusing on basic historical profiles and on incorporating whatever useful stuff might already be on the page, or in the German language page for the team. Its been quite interesting. ] 03:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC) :I've been grinding my way through the German clubs alphabetically, using the available ], and doing what I can to flesh out the articles for each team with re-writes, additional info, logos, that sort of thing. Done about three dozen sides so far – into the G's – but have only touched on a couple of the big clubs to date. Werder and Alemannia, I think. Freshened up the article on the ], too. On a first pass through, I've been focusing on basic historical profiles and on incorporating whatever useful stuff might already be on the page, or in the German language page for the team. Its been quite interesting. ] 03:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 30 January 2006

The AID has restarted recently! Please nominate/vote and take part actively.

Article Improvement Drive
Article Improvement Drive
Shortcut
  • ]


This week's football improvement drive is part of the WikiProject on Football and is a weekly collaboration to improve football (soccer) articles to featured article status. Past collaborations are found on the history page, while removed nominations may be found on the removed nominations page.

Nomination and voting

Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. To nominate an article, you can copy the template that you will find as a comment in the page when you edit it. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are not counted, the nomination is an approval voting. In case of a tie, the candidate that was nominated first wins. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Template:FootballAID

Collaborations
Articles
Science and technology
Miscellaneous

Considerations for nominations

  • Giving reasons as to why an article should become the Football AID may convince others to cast their vote.
  • Can the wider football community easily contribute to the article? Or is it something only a small number of people will know about?

Nominations

The next project article is to be selected on Sunday 5 February.

Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

Norway national football team

Nominated January 17 2006; needs at least 8 votes by February 14 2006
Reason: After getting featured article status on the Norwegian Misplaced Pages, great portions of this article were translated to expand our article. It's quite detailed now. Perhaps with some work this could be a featured article in the future? Punkmorten 16
52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Support:
  1. NuclearFunk 19:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oldelpaso 10:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Punkmorten 19:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. ILDuceMas 19:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC}
  5. Arnemann 21:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Badmotorfinger 19:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:

Bayern Munich

Nominated January 18 2006; needs at least 10 votes by February 21 2006
Reason: Lacking in information for such an important team. Many other Bundesliga teams have substantially longer articles which is odd given that Bayern Munich is by far the most successful and most internationally known team in the league. The German article has much more information which could be easily incorporated into this article.
Support:
  1. Gail Wynand 02:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Poulsen 23:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Aabha (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Kinda crazy 16:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Starfighter Pilot 17:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Onomatopoeia 15:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. --Rollie 14:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. Kingjeff 19:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. File:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. Hargreavesfan 22:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
I've been grinding my way through the German clubs alphabetically, using the available club list, and doing what I can to flesh out the articles for each team with re-writes, additional info, logos, that sort of thing. Done about three dozen sides so far – into the G's – but have only touched on a couple of the big clubs to date. Werder and Alemannia, I think. Freshened up the article on the Bundesliga, too. On a first pass through, I've been focusing on basic historical profiles and on incorporating whatever useful stuff might already be on the page, or in the German language page for the team. Its been quite interesting. Wiggy! 03:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
It's in a pretty awful state as is, with no history section and bulky tables. I'ld be happy to put my meagre German skills to the test, or assist in some other way. Poulsen 23:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
The article really is in desperate need of some attention, I agree. Although as a 1. FC Kaiserslautern fan, I will strongly promote a negative POV when editing ;) j/k Onomatopoeia 15:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I jumoed the gun and just inserted LOADS of info. Onomatopoeia 17:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

La Liga

Nominated January 24 2006; needs at least 6 votes by February 14 2006
Reason: Currently this article is little more than a list of previous winners, current clubs, and basic rules. Surely there must be so much more to be said about this topic. Jacoplane 04
51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Support:
  1. Jacoplane 04:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Conscious 12:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Mariano(t/c) 12:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Starfighter Pilot 12:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Kinda crazy 18:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
  • I've made a start on improving page as suggested. Hope this helps.

I agree with above comment about page only been about the Primera Division, with links to articles on other divisions.Djln--Djln 22:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


Galatasaray

Nominated January 25 2006; needs at least 6 votes by February 15 2006
Reason: it has won UEFA Cup and European Super Cup, but the page is not far from stub. There is not much information except players, presidents and managers names.--Ugur Basak 03
55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Support:
  1. Ugur Basak 03:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Starfighter Pilot 12:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Jack O Lantern 17:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Kingjeff 03:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:

Bayern Munich (womens' section)

Nominated January 28, 2006; needs at least 2 votes by February 4, 2006
Reason:

It's a new article that could easily be expanded into a good article.

Support:
  1. Kingjeff 15:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Hargreavesfan 22:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
  • Yes it does need its own page. Anything less would just be a stub. and yes, I have renominated it.

Football (soccer)

Nominated January 28, 2006; needs at least 6 votes by February 18, 2006
Reason:

The root article of all articles in this WikiProject. Needs references, and some of the language could be simplified, as the article should serve as an introduction to those unfamiliar with the sport. Cricket is a good example of how to do this well. A productive AID could see this article ready for peer review.

Support:
  1. Oldelpaso 19:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. -- Elisson Talk 00:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. File:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Conscious 20:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Comments:

How to nominate an article

Note to contributors:

To add a new nomination, please:

(1) Copy the template below
(2) Paste it at the bottom of the list of nominations
(3) Replace "day" with the correct date and "day + 7" with the date, plus seven days.
(4) Sign your user name with the directions in the template and add a comment for why the article should be nominated.
(5) Please preview your addition to make it sure all information is properly filled in and the links are working.

After nominating an article please place {{FootballIDRIVE}} on the article's main page.


Templates

Code What it looks like Where to use
{{FootballIDRIVE}}
This is a nomination for this week's football article improvement drive collaboration!
Please review this page's entry and voice your opinion.
On main pages of nominated articles.
{{FootballIDRIVECurrent}}
This is the current football collaboration of the week! Please help improve it to featured article standard.
On main pages of the current collaboration.

See also

/current collaboration

Categories: