| Revision as of 06:24, 20 July 2010 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →July 2010: +comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:05, 20 July 2010 edit undoXeno (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators103,385 edits →FYI: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div> | <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)</div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0058 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0058 --> | ||
| == FYI == | |||
| ]. –]] 17:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:05, 20 July 2010
July 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Zero-turn mower, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 19:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Uh, you want to try again? What, specifically, is disruptive about and ? Applying a 4th stage warning is highly inappropriate in this case. Perhaps you should be warned about inappropriate use of templates? If you disagree with the content of the article as Δ left it, take it to the article talk page rather than casting out warning templates to long established users. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- This is multiple reverts/templates that this user has placed, that where incorrect. He is giving me a final warning for removing a see also section that was completely external links, and for removing inline links to company websites (which where right next to links to their wiki pages) which are not needed and spamish. Jeff may need more of his actions reviewed to see if this is a more serious issue, but due to me already having a conflict of interest I dont want to personally go down that route. If his actions are this inappropriate towards established users, how many users has he bitten? ΔT 22:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- yup, bitey; and that <font size="4"> sig-vio is still there. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Misplaced Pages
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
FYI
WP:A/R/CL#Request for clarification: User:Betacommand. –xeno 17:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)