Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:27, 20 July 2010

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.

LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS

Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox

Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe

William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William

Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper

Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight

CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD

Thanks

Thanks for the advice. Ill have to remember to count to 10 before posting. I just finished reading the 5 pillars, so I feel in the future I can contribute a little more substance.lol

                                       Frank

Reply

Climate change arbitration

Hi, I have requested that your name be added to the list of involved editors in the climate change arbitration case, as you have been a major editor in the topic area. --JN466 14:55, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quit VANDALIZING the Al Gore Article

The 'charges have to be filed' standard is one you WHOLLY made up. It is NOT a wik policy.68.41.55.171 (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Please comment on the talk page. And it would be a good idea to familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages policy first, before accusing someone of vandalising . --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

If you feel that is the standard on diaries, go clean up the Nikki Haley diary. If not, you demonstrate that the reason you are editing it is solely political. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.82.168 (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Diaries? Where does diaries come into anything? And sorry - i haven't even got a clue as to who "Nikki Haley" is. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Climate change moving to Workshop

This Arbitration case is now moving into the Workshop phase. Please read Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration#Workshop to understand the process. Editors should avoid adding to their evidence sections outside of slight tweaks to aid in understanding; large-scale additions should not be made. Many proposals have already been made and there has already been extensive discussion on them, so please keep the Arbitrators' procedures in mind, namely to keep "workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible." Workshop proposals should be relevant and based on already provided evidence; evidence masquerading as proposals will likely be ignored. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Allegations vs. formal charges

I noted with interest your recent comments at Talk:Al Gore. I think you are right: if it is a mere allegation, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. My question is, in light of this, how would you deal with Death of Jeremiah Duggan? --Queen of the Dishpan (talk) 21:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Voting on Al Gore Talk Page

Kim, Just wondering if you'd like to vote on the Al Gore issue. I have set up a little voting section here, and I am sending this note to everyone who participated on the talk page. --Regards KeptSouth (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Question

You think i should be cautioned for being called a proxy for socks? All WMC had to do was remove that accusation, he did not and is now wasting time and causing disruption because of his intransigence. mark nutley (talk) 13:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

You were "proxying for a sock". And for that you should be cautioned, more specifically because your later talk-comments indicate that you still haven't figured out what was wrong with your action. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

No i was not, i was following WP:TPG which says do not alter or remove another editors comments. Until the guy was blocked then the comment should not have been removed. I give up on you, regardless of what WMC says you rush to cover has arse, he broke his civility parole by accusing me of proxing for socks. His refusal to remove the attack is disruptive. mark nutley (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:TPG says no such thing. It in fact states that "harmful edits" can be removed. And edits from a sock is considered harmful. By reinstating the suspected socks comment - you were meatpuppeting (or "proxying") for the suspected sock. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Quite frankly to my eyes you are digging yourself deeper by not recognizing that this was a mistake. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

My last comment on this WP:TPG Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism What i restored was none of those, it was a harmless comment. You have now writte Suspected several times. That was my point, it was a suspected sock and until he was blocked his comments should not have been removed. I`m done with you mark nutley (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see WP:GS/CC/RE#Suspected_Scibaby_sockpuppets as to why you are wrong. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

BLP/CC enforcement request

here. Cla68 (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)