Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Graboid (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:39, 26 July 2010 editOtto4711 (talk \| contribs)59,599 edits afd2		Revision as of 01:50, 26 July 2010 edit undoOtto4711 (talk \| contribs)59,599 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:{{la\|Graboid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Graboid (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})		:{{la\|Graboid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Graboid (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})
	:({{Find sources\|Graboid}})		:({{Find sources\|Graboid}})
	'''Delete''' - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the ] and the ]. There is no question that the ''Tremors'' films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element ~~withing~~ that work of fiction is notable. ] (]) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)		'''Delete''' - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the ] and the ]. There is no question that the ''Tremors'' films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element within that work of fiction is notable. ] (]) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:50, 26 July 2010

Graboid

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the general notability guideline and the guideline for writing about fiction. There is no question that the Tremors films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element within that work of fiction is notable. Otto4711 (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories:

Revision as of 01:39, 26 July 2010 editOtto4711 (talk \| contribs)59,599 edits afd2		Revision as of 01:50, 26 July 2010 edit undoOtto4711 (talk \| contribs)59,599 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:{{la\|Graboid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Graboid (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})		:{{la\|Graboid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Graboid (2nd nomination)}}\|2=AfD statistics}})
	:({{Find sources\|Graboid}})		:({{Find sources\|Graboid}})
	'''Delete''' - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the ] and the ]. There is no question that the ''Tremors'' films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element ~~withing~~ that work of fiction is notable. ] (]) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)		'''Delete''' - previous nomination closed no consensus and in the interim no new potential sources appear to have emerged. There is no indication that this fictional creature is independently notable. Those few sources which mention it do so either completely in an in-universe capacity (describing the plots of one or more of the films or the TV series) or mention the creature in passing. It fails both the ] and the ]. There is no question that the ''Tremors'' films are notable. However, the notability of a work of fiction does not mean that every aspect or element within that work of fiction is notable. ] (]) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)