Misplaced Pages

Names of large numbers: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:39, 28 May 2004 view source132.205.15.42 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 01:53, 28 May 2004 view source Dpbsmith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,940 edits IntroductionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
:''This page has been listed on ]. Please see that page for justifications and discussion]''<br> :''This page has been listed on ]. Please see that page for justifications and discussion]''<br>

==Introduction==

Some large numbers have real referents in human experience. Their names are real words, encountered in many contexts. For example, today, Google News shows 78,600 hits on "billion," starting with "Turkey Repays $1.6 Billion In Foreign Debt." It shows 9870 hits on "trillion," and 56 on "quadrillion:" "The US Department of Energy reports that in 2002, the United States economy consumed 97.6 quadrillion btus (quad btus)."

References to names of quantities larger than a quadrillion are rare, and increasingly artificial; they tend to be limited to discussions of names of numbers, or mathematical concepts. For example, the first hit on "quintillion" is about a man who is trying to preserve the Etsako language by codifying it, and "went as far as providing numerals from one to quintillion."

Nevertheless, large numbers have an intellectual fascination, and naming them is one of the ways in which people try to conceptualize and understand them.

In ''The Sand Reckoner,'' Archimedes introduced a system in which he called a myriad myriad (10<sup>8</sup>) a "first number" a myriad myriad first numbers as "second numbers) (10<sup>16</sup>), and so on up to "eighth numbers" (10<sup>64</sup>). He concludes that if the entire known universe were filled with sand, the number of grains of sand required would be less than "one thousand myriad myriad eighth numbers."

Since then, many others have engaged in the pursuit of conceptualizing and naming numbers that really have no existence outside of the imagination. Such names, even if found in dictionaries, have a tenuous existence. Just as one can debate whether "floccinaucinihilipilification" is really an English word&mdash;it is in the Oxford English Dictionary, but no other&mdash;it is questionable how real the word "trigintillion" is. "Trigintillion" is only encountered in definitions, lists of names of large numbers, and "Sand Reckoner"-like discourses on the meaning of very large numbers.

Even in contexts where huge numbers are meaningful&mdash;science, astronomy, and engineering&mdash;and where dictionary names such as "sextillion" exists, they are not used. Since the 1800s, scientists have used the "scientific notation" in which numbers are expressed as multiples of ten. When such a number needs to be named, "ten to the forty-fifth" is easier to say, easier to understand, and less ambiguous than "quattuordecillion" (which means something different to American and British audiences&mdash;assuming that there are any listeners who understand this number without consulting a dictionary). When the number represents a measurement, rather than a count, the ]es are used; one says "femtosecond," not "one quadrillionth of a second." In other cases, rather than using names for large numbers, specialized large units are invented, such as the astronomer's parsec and light year.

Here we present some names that have been given to large numbers, and the context and authority for the names. Keep in mind, however, that these names are very rarely used, and are more in the nature of curiosities or trivia than genuine working English vocabulary.

==The Googol family==



<table border="1"> <table border="1">

Revision as of 01:53, 28 May 2004

This page has been listed on Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion. Please see that page for justifications and discussion.

Introduction

Some large numbers have real referents in human experience. Their names are real words, encountered in many contexts. For example, today, Google News shows 78,600 hits on "billion," starting with "Turkey Repays $1.6 Billion In Foreign Debt." It shows 9870 hits on "trillion," and 56 on "quadrillion:" "The US Department of Energy reports that in 2002, the United States economy consumed 97.6 quadrillion btus (quad btus)."

References to names of quantities larger than a quadrillion are rare, and increasingly artificial; they tend to be limited to discussions of names of numbers, or mathematical concepts. For example, the first hit on "quintillion" is about a man who is trying to preserve the Etsako language by codifying it, and "went as far as providing numerals from one to quintillion."

Nevertheless, large numbers have an intellectual fascination, and naming them is one of the ways in which people try to conceptualize and understand them.

In The Sand Reckoner, Archimedes introduced a system in which he called a myriad myriad (10) a "first number" a myriad myriad first numbers as "second numbers) (10), and so on up to "eighth numbers" (10). He concludes that if the entire known universe were filled with sand, the number of grains of sand required would be less than "one thousand myriad myriad eighth numbers."

Since then, many others have engaged in the pursuit of conceptualizing and naming numbers that really have no existence outside of the imagination. Such names, even if found in dictionaries, have a tenuous existence. Just as one can debate whether "floccinaucinihilipilification" is really an English word—it is in the Oxford English Dictionary, but no other—it is questionable how real the word "trigintillion" is. "Trigintillion" is only encountered in definitions, lists of names of large numbers, and "Sand Reckoner"-like discourses on the meaning of very large numbers.

Even in contexts where huge numbers are meaningful—science, astronomy, and engineering—and where dictionary names such as "sextillion" exists, they are not used. Since the 1800s, scientists have used the "scientific notation" in which numbers are expressed as multiples of ten. When such a number needs to be named, "ten to the forty-fifth" is easier to say, easier to understand, and less ambiguous than "quattuordecillion" (which means something different to American and British audiences—assuming that there are any listeners who understand this number without consulting a dictionary). When the number represents a measurement, rather than a count, the SI prefixes are used; one says "femtosecond," not "one quadrillionth of a second." In other cases, rather than using names for large numbers, specialized large units are invented, such as the astronomer's parsec and light year.

Here we present some names that have been given to large numbers, and the context and authority for the names. Keep in mind, however, that these names are very rarely used, and are more in the nature of curiosities or trivia than genuine working English vocabulary.

The Googol family

GOOGOL!
Value Name
0 Zero
1 One
10 Googol
10 Googolplex
10 Googolduplex Googolplexplex
10 Googoltriplex Googolplexplexplex


This table contains a list of numbers that extend to very large sums. Note that there is no standard way of naming after centilliard or centillion.

This is a list of obscenely large numbers
Value Extended American
(Chuquet)
Extended European
(Pelletier)
Extended Myriadic
(Knuth)
Extended Myriadic
(Knuth-Pelletier)
0 Zero Zero Zero Zero
10 One One One One
10 Thousand Thousand Thousand Thousand
10 Ten thousand Ten thousand Myriad Myriad
10 Million Million Hundred myriad Hundred myriad
10 Hundred million Hundred million Myllion Myllion
10 Billion Milliard Ten myllion Ten myllion
10 Ten quadrillion Ten billiard Byllion Mylliard
10 Septillion Quadrillion Tryllion Byllion
10 Decillion Quintilliard Ten Quintyllion Ten bylliard
10 ? Decillion ?
10 ? Decilliard ?
10 Centillion ? ?
10 ? Centillion ?
10 ? Centilliard ?
10 Millillion ? ?
10 ? Millillion ?
10 ? Millilliard ?
10 Myrillion ? ?
10 ? Myrillion ?
10 ? Myrilliard ?
10 ? ? ?
10 Micrillion ? ?
10 Nanillion ? ?
10 Picillion ? ?
10 Femtillion ? ?
10 Attillion ? ?
10 Zeptillion ? ?
10 Yoctillion ? ?
10 Xonillion ? ?
10 Dekillion
Vecillion
Contillion
? ?
10 Mecillion ? ?
10 Duecillion ? ?
10 Trecillion ? ?
10 Tetrecillion ? ?
10 Pentecillion ? ?
10 Hexecillion ? ?
10 Heptecillion ? ?
10 Octecillion ? ?
10 Ennecillion ? ?
10 Icocillion
Ducontillion
? ?
10 Triacontillion ? ?
10 Tetracontillion ? ?
10 Pentacontillion ? ?
10 Hexacontillion ? ?
10 Heptacontillion ? ?
10 Octacontillion ? ?
10 Ennacontillion ? ?
10 Hectillion
Icocontillion
? ?
10 Killillion
Onillion
? ?
10 Megillion ? ?
10 Gigillion ? ?
10 Terillion ? ?
10 Petillion ? ?
10 Exillion ? ?
10 Zettillion ? ?
10 Yottillion ? ?
10 Xennillion ? ?
10 Vekillion
Teenillion
? ?
10 Mekillion ? ?
10 Duekillion ? ?
10 Trekillion ? ?
10 Tetrekillion ? ?
10 Pentekillion ? ?
10 Hexekillion ? ?
10 Heptekillion ? ?
10 Octekillion ? ?
10 Ennekillion ? ?
10 Icokillion
Twentillion
? ?
10 Thirtillion ? ?
10 Fortillion ? ?
10 Fiftillion ? ?
10 Sixtillion ? ?
10 Seventillion ? ?
10 Eightillion ? ?
10 Nintillion ? ?
10 Hundrillion ? ?
10 Thousillion ? ?
10 Myriaillion
Manillion
? ?
10 Lakhillion ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 Crorillion ? ?
10 Awkillion ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
10 ? ? ?
... ... ... ...

Commercial Product using Yoctillion

See Also


This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.