Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:11, 1 February 2006

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive1

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive2

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive3

WP:V and Otherkin

read www.otherkin.net on the subject of becoming otherkin, or awakening, and youll find the sources for the awakening section on the otherkin page. you cant treat it like scientific subject, casue its about belief....Gimmiet 19:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

why must you mess with everything im trying to do? i try to find the cutes for your askings, but all i hear outta you is whining... please try to see that this whole thing aint easy, in by no means an expert, in just trying to help the site, and all i see you doing is methodically damaging the site and not being willing to put any damnned effort into trying to make it better in a constructive way... why is that?19:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

You mention if an administrator has a problem with what you're doing with Gabe, let you know. As an administrator with an interest in this case, I think you are doing an incredible job at structuring things and attempting to get some help out of Gabe - it's unfortunate he ignores every attempt. --Golbez 22:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Autobio

Are you taking the fucking piss? Englishrose 22:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• I didn't say there was a WP: Auto problem. I can give you a 90% guarantee that there isn't, but there is some doubt, although I feel it's marginal. There is no evidence to show that the original IP author is Aladin...but there is no evidence to show that it isn't. There were some sock-puppets who voted in the last delete and wrote parts of the article (hyped it up). However, several editors practically got rid of all the hype (look through the history, you'll know what I mean). Some could claim that the people hyping it up were aladin but frankly there is no evidence of this and those claims are unfounded. Sorry if I was a bit pissed off by the question but someone had already accussed 20+ of the editors of being sockpuppets and the majority of them including were proved entirely innocent. I hope that sheds light on the issue. Oh and the evidence suggests that he is notable for wikipedia if you examine it and where it comes from etc etc. Englishrose 22:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Part of my comment on the WP:Auto had a major word missing. Englishrose 22:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Also the thing that is wrong in the article is: 1. Out of the 19 who voted keep, 4 were sockpuppets...but they didn't really make a difference. 2. He's more notable in places like India, which makes it harder to get info. 3. More comments could be included with citations that would pass as acceptable in normal circumstances but due to the way the article was originally written where it hyped up aladin, some of the information is discarded. Only rock solid citations is allowed such as that can be verified as presented in my comment. 4. The redirects and histeria caused by other users hasn't helped the cause.

It is a mess but only due to the above points. It's hard to understand, even I find a lot of stuff confusing and I've been contacting other magicians/magic related places about him for the last 3 weeks. Englishrose 22:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Count and read for yourself, here. 4 were of them were sockpuppers: Tiksustoo, Autumnleaf, Aloodum , Grroin. 2 others who edited the article were sockpuppets but did not take part in the vote. On the 2nd one, some voted redirect, some voted keep and some voted deleted. I told you it was messy. Englishrose 22:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Been following this

I think this comment should be brought to the attention of the editor you have been dealing with so patiently trying to convince as to properly citing sources. He must be able to assure the Misplaced Pages community at large ( you, me, the other interested parties and the arbitrators who heard his case previously) that he understands key WP precepts as NPOV and citing accuarate and verifiably trustworthy sources. If he is incapable of working within the parameters of Misplaced Pages, he should probably be blocked from doing so. His inclusion of his uncited contributions, and his related reversions/deletions of extant material, flies in the face of (again, IMO) the instructions to him by ArbCom. Help him to understand the ground rules if anything. Ask, perhaps that he does indicate he has done some of the reading as to pertinent WP policies. Until he can do this convincingly, I don't see any credibility in his arguments concerning either the veracity of the information he contributes, or his motivations for doing so. The point that Chairboy makes in the link above should be stressed to Gabe?Gav?Ket? " et al." that all Misplaced Pages editors are held to the same standards and rules of deployment. Good luck! Hamster Sandwich 18:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Qur'an/Picture Controversy

Template:Civil1 ComputerJoe 21:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

aladin

Do I understand correctly your position that all verifiable information is encyclopedic? I am trying to figure out my own attitude in this respect. I conjectured you are not alone and typed your self-definition "inclusionist" into wikipedia search and saw m:Inclusionism and many other interesting meta-discussion. I did not know about the existence of the whole meta-phylosophy! Very interesting. Mukadderat 21:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

John Lott

Please see the JL page, which is reverted back to the POV version. I'm out of reverts for the next 22 hrs or so. Thanks, --Pierremenard 02:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Batzarro

Please can you unblock my user page? I have a ton of useful editss(see my contribs) My only problems were fair use images on my user page and suspected sockpuppet accounts which I strongly deny.These people are impersonators Please can you unblock my user page,I am not a vandal. Batzarro 07:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Kirpan

That was an antique kirpan. The one who made it is probably dead. It was made ages ago. Batzarro 15:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

OK,anyway whats happening regarding the sockpuppet scene? Batzarro 15:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

I am not a sockpuppet vandal Batzarro 16:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from Lulu

Storm clouds ...	and silver linings	Thank you for your support on my RfA.
		Unfortunately, it failed to reach consensus. Nonetheless, it proved an opportunity to establish contacts and cooperation with many supportive editors, which will be beneficial to editing Misplaced Pages in the future. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters (t @)

Thank you

Thank you for removing the comments at the Misplaced Pages:AMA Requests for Assistance page. Though I am sure you did not mean it as a personal attack, seeing you refer to me there as a "misguided user" did make me somewhat uncomfortable, as it was a reference to a person, and not the content (referring to WP:NPA "comment on content, not the contributor"). I am glad that the messages were removed though, thanks. Elonka 22:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

(followup) Hipocrite, regarding the comment that you placed on my user page. I find the comment a personal attack, not to mention uncivil. I would ask you to please read the Misplaced Pages policies at Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks and Misplaced Pages:Civility, and to be more careful of your behavior in the future. I do have a question though, which is, Why do you seem to be having such a strong reaction to the situation? I have to admit some bafflement as to your recent involvement, not to mention concerns about some of the edits you've made at the article about me. I've been trying very hard to assume good faith, but some of your edits and edit summaries have implied otherwise, and taken in total with the personal attacks, the conclusion seems to be that you just plain dislike me. Is this accurate, and may I ask why you feel the way that you do? Elonka 06:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Advocacy

Sure, sounds good. Give me a little while to write something up on your subpage. Everyking 19:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Economics416 is Anakinskywalker

Note he uses the exact same style on User Ardenn’s talk page as anakin used to on the Uof Ottawa talk page. He is also POV pushing the same stuff on University of Ottawa. David D. (Talk) 23:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

John Lott

Actually I don't understand the question since I think it's an edit war, but I'm tired of arguing with people who don't understand semi protection. I have a feeling you see it as an edit war as well, I'm guessing? --Woohookitty 02:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

OK. If I was in error, someone will overrule me. --Woohookitty 11:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Suffrage List

Thank you for compiling the list of those who've suffrage. It is a great help. You did follow the parameters of the guideline passed just recently, didn't you? Wally 02:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Re:AMA

Sorry, i've been out of the loop on that area. I went over to that talk page, but just saw a long string of text. Mind summing up what you're talking about? Thanks! Karmafist 15:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Archived pages

Please do not modify old archive pages. I know you meant well, but we simply can't remove other people's comments, especially from archived pages to try to satisfy what an uncooperative and uncivil editor calls a personal attack just because it displeases her. DreamGuy 18:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Lolicon & "alerts"

Given what you've written here you might want to consider reading this. Mikkerpikker ... 16:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes yes, The Wrong Version. Maybe this time you can try not to drive people away from Misplaced Pages. =D · Katefan0/poll 17:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Do not change closed afd discussions

He's wrong though. The conclusions are plain wrong. Ardenn 17:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I care about this because I'm right. And with no consensus, it's easier to re-list it on afd in a month. Ardenn 17:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to hide the fact that I plan to re-list it. Ardenn 17:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm a fan of winning too, it doesn't make what that admin did right. Ardenn 17:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps, I did list it on that page you recommended. Ardenn 17:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC) I went and removed that nomination. Ardenn 17:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Is there a template to dispute templates? Ardenn 17:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your help on this. Ardenn 18:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

It wouldn't let me dispute Template:vprotect since it's protected. Ardenn 18:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Do you use instant messaging? Ardenn 18:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I don't make friends with those who are acting in bad faith against me. Ardenn 19:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Apology

Hipocrite, I would like to apologize for calling you a troll at the Administrator noticeboard. I was angry at some of the comments you had placed on my own talk page and in that discussion, but it was a hasty over-statement for me to call you a troll in a public forum. I have reconsidered my opinion and removed my accusation.

I have reviewed your posting history, and though I do not agree with you on all matters, I think there are many things that we do very much agree on, such as being supportive at the student project page at Lincoln Akerman School. It is my sincere hope that we will be able to put the past incidents behind us, and be able to work together in a civil manner in the future. I truly desire to be able to work with you rather than against you. I hope you will accept my apology. - Elonka 17:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)