| Revision as of 21:03, 7 August 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,105 edits Added {{tilde}} note. | Revision as of 22:06, 7 August 2010 edit undoCplakidas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers222,101 edits →Cumans: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Your recent edits== | ==Your recent edits== | ||
| ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 21:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 21:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Cumans == | |||
| Hello, and ]. First, some ground rules: try to be ], and not to ], even if they commit the heinous crime of disagreeing with you... Yes, I know that the Turkic tribes are of Central Asian origin and that their characteristics originally were Mongoloid rather than Caucasian, but you are missing the point: "ethnic" does not mean "genetic". If modern scholars classify them as a Turkic tribe based on linguistic and cultural criteria, than that is what they are, just as for example the modern-day Turks or Azeris. What blood flows in a people's veins is utterly irrelevant after a couple of centuries in a conquered new land... Generally, it is bad form to include large rants and blocks of argumentative text of the "it follows", "everyone knows that A, therefore B..." kind. It smacks too much of ], ] opinions, and these tend to be quickly removed. If you have ] to back up your argument, please do so, and it will stay there. Otherwise, ranting that "blond-haired and blue-eyed people" can not possibly be Turkic just because their DNA is patently wrong will get you nowhere. Regards, ] ] 22:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 7 August 2010
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Cumans
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. First, some ground rules: try to be civil and calm, and not to call other people names, even if they commit the heinous crime of disagreeing with you... Yes, I know that the Turkic tribes are of Central Asian origin and that their characteristics originally were Mongoloid rather than Caucasian, but you are missing the point: "ethnic" does not mean "genetic". If modern scholars classify them as a Turkic tribe based on linguistic and cultural criteria, than that is what they are, just as for example the modern-day Turks or Azeris. What blood flows in a people's veins is utterly irrelevant after a couple of centuries in a conquered new land... Generally, it is bad form to include large rants and blocks of argumentative text of the "it follows", "everyone knows that A, therefore B..." kind. It smacks too much of biased, personal opinions, and these tend to be quickly removed. If you have reliable sources to back up your argument, please do so, and it will stay there. Otherwise, ranting that "blond-haired and blue-eyed people" can not possibly be Turkic just because their DNA is patently wrong will get you nowhere. Regards, Constantine ✍ 22:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)