| Revision as of 08:31, 12 March 2004 edit211.28.8.24 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:24, 30 May 2004 edit undo12.214.45.9 (talk) Removed unnecessary explanation.Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Archived debate: ] vs. TIME CUBE | Archived debate: ] | ||
| Moved to ] as it's a dialogue 38 kilobytes long. ] 06:01, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:24, 30 May 2004
See Talk:Time Cube/Delete for a past discussion on whether this article should have been deleted.
All the anti-Cubic arguments in the "Time Cube" article are actually wrong and can be easily refuted. However, rather than correct the article myself, I will simply invite any free thinkers who are interested in learning the Truth to debate Time Cube on the Time Cube forum. No closed-minded Academian pedants, please.
UPDATE: The forum is out of commission. However I may discuss Time Cube on user talk pages, like I did with Andrewa.
Archived debate: Andrewa vs. TIME CUBE