| Revision as of 23:42, 24 August 2010 editAgadaUrbanit (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers8,961 edits →August 2010: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:46, 25 August 2010 edit undoWGFinley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,088 edits →August 2010Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| == August 2010 == | == August 2010 == | ||
| I personally feel that is unexplained. There is long discussion on article talk page and I agree with 79, it appears that proposed change is according to Misplaced Pages ] policy and would make Misplaced Pages more consistent and encyclopedic. ] (]) 23:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | I personally feel that is unexplained. There is long discussion on article talk page and I agree with 79, it appears that proposed change is according to Misplaced Pages ] policy and would make Misplaced Pages more consistent and encyclopedic. ] (]) 23:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Agada is correct you did not explain your revert and then you reverted him when he had properly used his own revert. More below. --] (]) 13:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] The ] has permitted ] to impose, at their own discretion, ] on any editor working on pages broadly related to the ] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you continue with the behavior on ], you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at ]. This article currently has a ] probation which includes explaining your reverts (you did not) and allows only one revert per editor per 24 hours (which you violated). Please cease the ] on the article or you may be subject to sanctions including ].<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> --] (]) 13:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:46, 25 August 2010
March 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page Eagle Talon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
I personally feel that this revert is unexplained. There is long discussion on article talk page and I agree with 79, it appears that proposed change is according to Misplaced Pages neutrality policy and would make Misplaced Pages more consistent and encyclopedic. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agada is correct you did not explain your revert and then you reverted him when he had properly used his own revert. More below. --WGFinley (talk) 13:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Golan Heights
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you continue with the behavior on Golan Heights, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. This article currently has a 1RR probation which includes explaining your reverts (you did not) and allows only one revert per editor per 24 hours (which you violated). Please cease the edit warring on the article or you may be subject to sanctions including blocking. --WGFinley (talk) 13:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)