| Revision as of 21:56, 25 August 2010 edit76.208.184.170 (talk) →Hey: m← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:17, 26 August 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Bogdangiusca/Archive16.Next edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| Sper ca o sa se rezolve situatia intr-un mod fericit si o sa primesc o a doua sansa. | Sper ca o sa se rezolve situatia intr-un mod fericit si o sa primesc o a doua sansa. | ||
| Te rog mult sa-mi dai un raspuns, oricat de scurt, macar cat sa stiu ca ai parcurs acest mesaj. | Te rog mult sa-mi dai un raspuns, oricat de scurt, macar cat sa stiu ca ai parcurs acest mesaj. | ||
| == Hey == | |||
| Hi BG, maybe by understanding we will come to like each other again. I posted an outline of an explanation of why I was like that in 2008, and some of what I was going through in 2009. The outline of the explanation is at one of your talk pages in Wiktionary. I hope you understand that I am a nice-enough guy who was harassed a lot by psychopaths in 2007 and early 2008. They really were psychopaths. More details are on your talk page there. I feel the need to explain and apologize. You BG I don't recall that you hurt me directly. A one-time friend, ] (]) 17:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :A thing that I often think about when I think about you: we are in a number of ways similar, in many other ways pretty different. I mean mentally. Physically you look like one of my cousins in Romania (and my hair has almost gotten as dark as yours lately, though my hair color may bounce back, some hair dye I used in '06 looks to have affected my hair color). That's one reason why I don't like hurting Romanians. Back to what I was saying about our similarities and differences: in many ways, you seem like an atheist version of me. Although I would have been more interested in scientific research rather than engineering. And I would have been in Los Angeles. And many other differences. Now when I consider you, you are an atheist and an engineer in a country where---so I read---Christianity, especially Orthodox Christianity, has become very popular after the disappearance of communism. And many Romanian students these days are not going into scientific/technology careers (that was surprising when I read that, because in communist Romania, science and technology should have been very popular). So from that perspective that's kinda like a commendable move, because Romania needs more young science/technology students. However my perspective, I was raised in Los Angeles, where there is no community like in a small town, there was no real Romanian community in Los Angeles in the 80s or 90s or now, much less a church-going Romanian community. If there was one, I was not part of it. Until age 20---possibly even to this day, I'm not sure, I could count on both hands how many times I had been to a church. One reason was because there were no Orthodox churches in the area, the other reasons, the churches that were around they were not part of our culture or community, and my parents don't seem to have been church-goers, maybe because they were raised in communist Romania. I grew up pretty secular, and my education was completely secular, in my L.A. public schools I don't even remember that any of my teachers ever gave a personal side discussion about creationism or something like that. This was Los Angeles. I had a secular scientific education. So you see, I had no church-going religious culture to rebel against. I grew up in a non-church-going environment and religion was something you interpreted yourself a lot. At some times in my early teens I was an atheist. In my late teens religion was out the window, I was into Rimbaud. In my early 20s I got into the popular music of our generation more, rock and rap, again not a religious environment. Religions were studied, but I was undecided, most of the time not an atheist, though atheism obviously was there. Now after some experiences I had in my mid 20s, I'm a sort of Buddhist. Not an atheist. Our interaction got kind of messed up crazy persons in myspace that messed with my mind and attacked me, so it may be years before we talk to each other like we used to. ] (]) 22:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :BG replies: Alex, why are you spending these minutes with me, lil' BG? Don't you remember what BG posted in 2003? BG posted this: "One explanation is that Romanian-Dacian is in fact proto-Latin." BG is just going with what BG goes with. A BG is a BG. ] (]) 00:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I do remember that BG posted that, and I linked that before and I can link that again, it's on ] going back to 2003. Mostly, I'm spending a few minutes with BG because I met BG back in late 2004, and I don't have many Romanian friends. BG doesn't want to be friends anymore? I remember when BG came in 2005 to defend me against the attacks of Chronographos on User talk:Chronographos I think it was. But BG changed. He's sure of his atheism. He's also sure that Buddhism is just a body of thought developed by some people hundreds and hundreds of years ago, and it bears no relation to physical reality. BG likes Stephen Hawkings. Even though Hawkings releases "warnings" about extraterrestrials that we've all heard a million times before, but Hawkings seems to think that if he says it, then it has some sort of stamp of approval. ] (]) 01:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Here is what BG posted in July 2003: | |||
| :''One way to explain this is that Romanian/Dacian is in fact proto-latin, a language from which Latin evolved. Even Dacians from the Roman Empire were mostly living in mountains and there were not so often contacts with Roman cities (mostly in lowlands). And also the Roman occupation lasted only around 150 years, less than England's domination and most colonists and soldiers were not from Rome, but from other previously occupied provinces and it's hard to believe they could teach Latin in its whole complexity to the locals.'' | |||
| :''Another thing that could enforce this theory is that Romanian keeps some characteristics of classical Latin grammer not found or simplified in other Romance languages (even Italian), like declensions, neutre gender, verb tenses, etc.'' | |||
| :'' Also, on a more subjective tone, once someone learns Romanian, learning another language (latin or even just indo-european) much easily.'' | |||
| :'' It is believed that the Latins (to become Romans after the founding of Rome in 700 BC) came to Italian peninsula only in the 1st millenium BC and the most likely place to be their origin can't be Northern Europe (no language connection to German), nor Western Europe (Gauls, Celts), but Danube region, where the Dacians lived. There are quite a few historians that agree to this theory, but still not enough physical proofs. We just know that the Danube culture of the Dacian was pretty advanced at the time (clay plates writing even older than Sumer) '' | |||
| :'' The only proof of an independent Dacian language from Latin is the 200 words that are believed to be of Dacian origin, some of them are also found in Albanian (they have a language based on the local Thracian dialects) and some in the language of the Balts. But the Dacians were just a tribe of the Thracians (as Herodot said) and they shared some vocabulary, but the differences were pretty big.'' | |||
| : ''Oh, and there are some similarities of Romanian with Sanskrit (about 500 words, for example "doina" = some type of mourning song -> "daina" in Sanskrit).'' | |||
| : ''Another evidence is that of there are many words from Sardinian which are closer to Romanian than to Italian, French, Spanish or even Latin. That was explained by saying that the same rules of language developement were used in both places. (as example: "limba" in Romanian and Sardinian as opposed to all other Romance languages: langue, lingua, etc. and "cantigu" in Sardinian, "cantec" in Romanian as oposed to canzone, chanson etc). Could it be that not Romans colonized Sardinia, but another Dacian tribe as the Latins ?'' | |||
| : ''] 11:25 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)'' <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :In July 2003 while Bogdan G. was an atheist and ranting about Dacians colonizing Sardinia and becoming Dacian-Sardinians, I had never even heard of any idea that the Dacians spoke a Latin-like language. I hadn't even begun to get into Romanian studies yet in 2003. I wasn't an atheist, I had no religion, I was collecting books, etc. ] (]) 16:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: :) Sorry, I didn't get yet to read all of this, I've been quite busy lately ]. | |||
| :: Anyway, about the silly stuff I did say seven years ago about linguistics: well, logic is not enough for a scientific theory, you need good raw data. As they say in CS, ]. At that time, I was trying to understand some stuff and the data I found was mostly wrong, so I got obviously some wrong conclusions. It didn't take long to see the contradictions in the theory and how the data was mostly fabricated. ] (]) 20:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It's okay cutie. I made very similar mistakes about one year after you posted that: September, October, November, December 2004. I remembered from before that often you wouldn't notice posts on your talk page till days or weeks later. If you find time to read the rest of the posts, mostly I'm trying to make an environment where we understand each other more. I recently encountered insane, twisted figures, in 2007 and early 2008, and they affected my mind. I apologize and I want you to know that (----) would never have happened if they hadn't messed with me. In Wiktionary I was explaining in more detail what they did who they were etc., if you want to read that later, an outline of what happened. I felt the need to talk to some people, including you, about what happened. ] (]) 21:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :We live in infinity BG, if there be infinity. There is a lot that competes for our time and attention. I know you're into science and engineering and you are currently an atheist. I'm also into science, not so much engineering. Here are some guys, not scientists per se, you may want to give some attention to if you haven't already, that I've found valuable: Arthur Rimbaud, Charles Bukowski, Max Ernst (see John Russell's book about him showing a lot of his work or whatever book is available in Bucharest), Basquiat, Picasso, Pierre Reverdy, and then there are those guys like Paul Eluard and Louis Aragon and others. I'm also going to take a look at Buddhism again. Talk to you later, ] (]) 16:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :BG, BG, BG, BG. Seven years ago: 2003. I miss that year now. I didn't use that year as well as I could have. I'm doing alright now, and I use the internet sparingly now. For the entire year 2003 I used the internet less than 10 hours. A few years ago though I was spending too much time on the internet. Some day I want to explain more about what happened during the past 7 years. The way people are though, if I told all the details of my story it would probably not only be a bother for me, but it would probably not be helpful for the humanity of today. By which I mean...instead of making them more moral, it could do the opposite. ] (]) 07:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It's likely B. that you never saw those posts where I said some stuff about you last year. It would be better if you didn't, and I'm not going to tell you where you can find the posts. BG, if a person gets shot in the leg badly enough, that person will limp at least for awhile. I didn't get shot in the leg, I was attacked in an elaborate way by 4 psychopaths (acting on ther own, though there may have been some contact between some of them) in myspace (not at my personal myspace, at some spoof account that I had back then) from late December 2006 to March 2008 during a very sensitive time. I didn't get shot in the leg: getting shot in the leg by some devices will hardly affect you, getting shot in the leg by high calibers can take your leg off. Getting shot by lesser calibers can make you limp for awhile. I was attacked mentally by those psychopaths, and they affected me for awhile. I posted more details on User talk:Bogdan in Wiktionary, check the history there some day. After almost 3 years that harassment has faded away a lot. In 2009 though it was still bothering me a lot. That's why I was moody in 2008 and 2009. You remember me from before B.G., I'm a nice guy. Talk to you later, ] (]) 20:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :By the way BG this explanation is for you and for me, not for that kid who has no idea what I'm talking about and who first encountered me late in the day. I woke up out of some fresh cool dreams this morning, dreams usually open those other worlds for my mind. My waking days these past few years, my mind was affected by idiots who should have never contacted me, let alone bother me. You've never been to L.A.? It's a nice place, and the weather is about as good as it gets. ] (]) 19:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :No BG has never been to L.A. I visited Bucharest in 1994 when it was in a transitional phase, a lot was under construction and yet to be redeveloped back then. I'm not into cold winters, I went in the summer. Living in L.A. all these years, I'm accustomed to fair weather, I don't have a good tolerance for cold weather, and it usually doesn't get too hot here. Also the beach is just over my shoulder, whereas you have to travel a ways to get to the beach. Who cares about the beach? Why I do. I like it there. ] (]) 19:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :BG, I miss the days when it was me, you and some others at this website, before that cocksucker and liar appeared, and others. ] (]) 20:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I want to detail a lot more than what I described on User talk:Bogdan, but I don't think I'll do that here. Or maybe some I will later. Now you saw how I described that figure here in Wiki just now, that figure who posted attacks to get me banned after I posted some stuff about him. My interaction with him snowballed in mid 2009, that would have not happened in that way had I not went through what I went through with others in 2007 and 2008. As I stated somewhere in Wiki before, I don't know if I would ever have even returned to Wiki had I not been attacked like that by murderous twisted psychopaths in myspace in 2007 and 2008. I left Wiki in spring 2006 and I didn't expect that I would have come back to edit often here again, but after what happened from late 2006 to early 2008, I came back here to forget what happened and to bring back early 2006 and 2005, when I was editing more often. And that was a move that worked well enough, although as some editors saw, I was very moody when I came back, those occurances had just happened some months before. The problem with internet interaction like this especially, we don't know what some person has just went through, or even why they are editing. When I came back in mid 2008 I tried to let people know that I came back mostly for fun and to get back to an atmosphere I had been away from for awhile, and to get away from a bad atmosphere. However, Wiki itself has its own passers-by, who I got into fights with. I posted above that I miss the early days of Wiki: actually I would prefer to have edited here much less than I did in 2005. BG, you don't pass by here much anymore, and I don't know how you feel about this internet age we live in, I favor casual and spare internet use. These years are starting to get---don't you guys notice it? I miss the late 1990s and early 2000s. Fuck the internet, even when by my own standards I was spending too much time on the internet in 2006 or 2007, it wasn't a lot compared to other people, maybe an average of 2 hours a day, I was exploring Los Angeles in those times a lot a lot, I think back and my travels were constant. In 2005 I spent more time using the internet, because this site had just come to my notice. That time was used exploring information at Wiki and that was okay. Is the internet making our planet less enjoyable? Think about that BG, and see you later, ] (]) 06:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I hope Bg that you are engineering a device that will kill off millions/billions of these monstrosities and evil abominations that are classified as "Homo sapiens". For the betterment of humanity. ] (]) 00:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, see how bad they were and how angry they got me. Well something has to be done to improve mankind, I'm more interested in changing the culture rather than dropping the new H-Bombs. Bg, you know as a young man who once was a boy who read a lot of sci-fi and comic books and enjoyed science and still enjoys science, yes an engineer has a lot of potential. But most of them end up working to help build a bridge or a building or an automobile or something like that, which is okay, but not my interest. I don't know if you're interested in the far-out possibilities of engineering, or if you are satisfied with the more everyday stuff. However BG, BG, Bg, BG, I don't know if you are building BG stuff. ] (]) 09:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Well BG, I don't know if you will add anything to engineering or science. But maybe you will add something to mass murder in one way or another. See Bg, I'm an H. sapien, you're an H. sapien. Yet BG, it is clear to me that many H. sapiens need to be trimmed away. Think about that BG. By the way Bg, you like to act like you are Mr. Bucharest, but really spend some time in L.A., you may change your mind. It's fun being in this city with almost no other Romanian-Americans in sight. It's fun being among the Koreans, Blacks, Central Americans, Chinese, because I create my own world much easier, like a man from the continent among islanders. ] (]) 07:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey BG BG, Lil' BG BG. Last time I checked there were over 6 BILLION people on this planet. That's a large number BG, and I wouldn't want to see that number double too quickly. I'm pretty clear-minded and lucid these days BG, and I'm healing from past events. And guess what, now that I'm healed, I would like to see many others dead. ] (]) 06:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Cf.]: ''The rapid increase in human population over the course of the 20th century has raised concerns about whether Earth is experiencing overpopulation. The scientific consensus is that the current population expansion and accompanying increase in usage of resources are linked to threats to the ecosystem, such as rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, global warming, and pollution.''---The scientific consensus. ] (]) 06:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Bogdan's 9 to 5: he works for an automobile manufacturer or a building business. He pops aspirin. He wants to marry soon. Bg's brains are BG brains, and they only have had BG experiences and BG thoughts. He probably does however agree that the human population will expand quicker than science can make such an expansion comfortable. Bogdan however has no ideas about what to do about that. BG wants to pay his bills, take vacations, then drop dead in several decades before the population explodes too much. ] (]) 08:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Haha, no, neither. I'm just working in software development, doing some magic with ]. | |||
| :: About the world population: don't worry, it will peak around 9 billion and slowly start to go down as Africans and Asians start to move to the cities. Urbanization greatly reduces the number of children. In lots of places, including Europe and Japan, we have serious issues with the population decline. The US gets a lot of immigrants; without them, the population of the US would go down, too. ] (]) 08:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I've thought about the Africa-Asia becoming more like Europe effect. That scenario is usually brought up when these discussions are had. However, will it be as smooth as that? Not necessarily. Remember, Europe and America never had so many at once in the first place. Asia and Africa have so many, billions, and so many will multiply for awhile. They are not going to just "stop having kids" because we want them to. I have never donated one cent to Asia or Africa. Then again, I'm a thrifty fellow. Take care, ] (]) 08:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: People just stop having kids after moving to the cities or getting more educated or wealthier. And it's not just in the most developed countries, it's everywhere. For instance in ], the country where my underwear was made: | |||
| :::Bangladesh, Total fertility rate, 1970: 6.9 (children per woman) | |||
| :::Bangladesh, Total fertility rate, 1990: 4.4 | |||
| :::Bangladesh, Total fertility rate, 2008: 2.3 | |||
| :::So, don't worry about this issue. It's more worrying the waste and improper usage of resources. (war, defence, nukes and all that) ] (]) 08:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, well I won't discuss it here anymore. But I just think about all those people out there...and I know there are much more than just 4 psychopaths in that world out there among them...when I think of all those sociopaths among the populace---extra-terrestrials, demons, chimeras are fictional so far. Human sociopaths are real, I encountered some, and after that I really changed my views about mankind. Send money to Africa, Asia, Louisiana, Kansas, Venezuela? Why? I don't care about them much. Bogdan, you are an atheist well okay but if you go Christian don't ever turn the other cheek to the point where others take advantage of you. There is so much in the Bible that has gotten decent people violated by maniacs over the centuries. Jesus was probably just an ordinary man---if not, well anyway be careful about the bible, I don't need to tell you that. Anyway, I believe in karma and dharma or something similar, and I don't feel that Christianity is helping people enough. And moral atheism can be just fine even if it's not true, but after my experiences, I'm not going towards atheism. I don't know if buddhism can help people more than christianity, I just expect that buddhism is closer to reality, and if so then buddhism should be more of a help to mankind. ] (]) 09:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :My brother said not too long ago, "These Westerners who convert to Buddhism or something, if you are going to convert to something convert to Christianity." I didn't tell my brother that I had already moved towards a type of Buddhism while still being open to Jesus if he was on the right track. My brother was not referring to me when he was thinking of Western converts to buddhism, he was talking about some other people. But these issues are very complex, and I don't want to tell my brother yet, "Hey man, you're not much into Christianity anyway, why don't you look into Buddhism more?" It has to make more sense for his life, the way it makes sense for mine. It took me many years to kind of realize that buddhism is probably the religion out there for me, and I'm not sure about that, but that's what I expect, that karma and dharma explains a lot of what I experienced. Buddhism though is not the only religion that talks about karma and dharma. Anyway, you have had a different life, and you have different expectations. ] (]) 09:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The article ] explains a lot, but doesn't exactly clarify what/which dharma concepts I'm talking about, because there are several more or less related concepts there. The older meaning of dharma, from the PIE root, was a concept of natural justice and order, a concept that is found in philosophies across the planet throughout history. There are other developments of the idea, for example dharma as in: the paths that are there for a person in their life. Batman and Spider-Man have very transparent dharma, but their karma is a mystery. If they were to exist in this world, we would clearly see Batman and Spider-Man's dharma, but we wouldn't know their karma. Buddhists have developed other meanings of dharma. The meaning that I'm mostly referring to is the one that I explained just now in my discussion of Batman and Spider-Man. ] (]) 20:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :By the way, I remember in the early 2000s when I used to watch ] and eat Danish cookies with milk. Those were nice times. I wouldn't mind having a girlfriend like that, though I'm not into blonde women so much. But she was a fun person. I mean the character. That was before my life went beyond the normal in the late 2000s. Although back then the dharma/karma, as I call it, was developing. ] (]) 20:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :There is always the question about whether, when we use these terms and concepts from hundreds and hundreds of years ago and adapt them to our views, whether we create a new philosophy. My answer is yes, I have my ideas, and when I reference dharma I am aware that I'm referencing it, in other words pointing to some ideas that are close to what I'm talking about, if not exactly what I'm talking. Not exactly, because the various concepts of dharma have a context that I haven't had time to look into that much yet. That's a historical/cultural anthropological investigation, to clarify the actual development and the context of those ideas. I'm just referencing them as approximations. That is why I say that I am "some type of Buddhist", because I would have to study their beliefs in detail and relate them to my ideas to be more specific. ] (]) 21:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :In my teens and again in the early 2000s I was studying a lot of philosophies and religions, but I wasn't getting many clues from actual life back then as to which philosophy/religion from the philosophies that claim to be describing reality is actually closest to reality. And I was often in a flux: Rimbaud-ism, Buddhism, Christianity, Taoism, and others, and in my early teens I had that "scientific atheism" which came from my largely scientific education. But in my mid 20s as I've been saying, I no longer was in the area of "normal life". That's when actual life began to unfold a story, and immediately it looks to be a clue about reality: and it's interesting that the experiences/the story doesn't immediately fit into any existing religion, nor does it fit into Bogdan's view. Of course, people like Bogdan don't even know what happened with me and how, and many people out there will try to fit what happened into their views: Orthodox Christianity, scientific Atheism, Islam, Catholicism, etc. However they don't know what happened and how it happened: only I know. I know it doesn't fit scientific atheism, as for most religions, well they always find ways to fit all kinds of new developments into their religions. The cocksuckers. I've met some of them, mostly online. ] (]) 01:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey thanks for having these posts on your talk page. If you're wondering which Dharma M.C. Adam Yauch is talking about on the song "Bodhisattva vow" from the 1994 ''Ill communication'' album, which I first heard when I was 13 years old, he's talking about the Buddhist Dharma, specifically meaning "the teachings of Buddha" or "the Truth". M.C. Adam Yauch: "Who brought down the Dharma for the sisters and brothers." That's what I'm trying to do with the experiences from my actual life, bring the Dharma for the sisters and brothers. ] (]) 06:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :On that other topic though, if the population peaks to 9 billion, that's already a disaster, I wouldn't be comfortable on such a world. Bogdan, I already frickin' read the article that talks about the population forecasts. I already frickin' know that developed countries have a lower birth rate. However 9 billion is not only too much, I don't expect that that 9 billion will decrease to 7 billion unless something more happens. ] (]) 00:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :And I don't mean that resources can't support 9 billion, I mean that 9 billion is already a disaster. And 9 billion won't go back to 6 billion unless something drastic happens. I don't even like the 6.8 billion population that we have now. ] (]) 00:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I shouldn't let population increase bother me too much and it won't help worrying, that's true. However I want to talk about this and make my disapproval clear, and 9 billion won't be "just fine" for a person like me. Fuck those people. And when I say "those people" I don't mean any section in particular, I mean fuck them. My favorite painters and poets are in the past, I enjoyed a world with much less than 9 billion people, and fuck a planet with 9 billion people. I don't want that. I walk the streets or drive through L.A. and most of my favorite moments, unless I'm looking to be around a lot of people (I often do look for that, but more often I don't), is when I'm on the streets with few others in sight. ] (]) 01:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Bogdan, I'm thinking of saying that most H. sapiens are pieces of shit. I'm trying to like a lot of people again. ] (]) 01:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Take a look at this picture from 1933 on the main page ]. 1933 looked like just yesterday. Engineering is pretty cool, maybe you'll help build some Futurist buildings. None of my 3 favorite poets were exactly Buddhists, but that's not my concern, and I'm not a Buddhist exactly yet either. Rimbaud when he was writing had thrown off Catholicism, and in his not always so-serious Saison en Enfer he makes references to the lost "wisdom of the East" that he was "seeking". I might quote that later but you guys can find that. ] according to the Wiki article accepted Catholicism. He was one of the most influential modern French poets, and one of my favorites. The case of Reverdy shows yet again that you can be a very modern artist (he was one of the most modern of French poets), but your religious ideas can be pretty wrong. Although I have not yet detected catholicism in his poems, the way you can clearly see it in Paul Claudel, etc. who I haven't read much of. Dali purportedly mixed Catholicism with Surrealism. I don't need any of that Catholicism... Buddhism fits into my life and my ideas well enough. ] (]) 02:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I want to remove some posts from the top of this section, but I posted them awhile ago with a different though similar IP, so I don't want to be reverted if I remove them. But I'm going to attempt that anyway. The discussion has moved on and I want to change the atmosphere. ] (]) 20:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :There's a new filter feature that doesn't allow for the change. I wanted to remove the first post and remove the first two sentences from the second post. ] (]) 20:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Well then I'll go into some other threads before I leave this page. "During his stay in America he (Max Ernst) published a two page list of poets (poets/writers on the left hand page, painters on the right), writers and painters that he particularly admired in a 1941 issue of the journal ''View''. Under the heading "Max Ernst's Favorite Poets and Painters of the past" we find a list of the poets/writers Rimbaud, (Alfred) Jarry, Guillaume Apollinaire, William Blake, Lautreamont, Poe, Whitman, Baudelaire, Goethe, Browning, Coleridge, Shakespeare, Novalis, Holderlin, Hugo, Lewis Carrol, Crabbe, Solomon, Arnim, Heine." I've mentioned all 20 that he mentions. Well that list is similar to many people's lists, including mine (Rimbaud, Apollinaire, Jarry, etc.). I used to like Poe and Blake more than I do now, I'm not into Shakespeare much, Coleridge was okay, I like reading Whitman but I can't use his style much because that style is too Whitman, etc. I've read some from those Germans he mentions. Bukowski wasn't publishing when Max Ernst compiled that list. I'm not going to list the painters he lists, you guys can find that. He mostly mentions painters of the past as the title says, but a newer painter he mentions is the Italian Chirico, also the Dutch Van Gogh, etc. ] (]) 21:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Well I'm almost healed, when they attacked my mind they physically affected me for awhile as well. Little Bogdan, the little Sardinian, the Little Sardine. I recently finished (re-)reading a biography about Apollinaire, and there are some stories (actual occurances in his life) about him that I want to tell you. For now I will tell you that while he was a refreshing poet who wrote from about 1900 to his death in 1918, it is agreed that his writings on art are kinda bad, though they helped popularize modern art---his writings about painters were full of fancies and ramblings where he was going off and writing whatever apparently occured to him, leaving Picasso and Braque and others to scratch their heads when they read what he wrote about their paintings and techniques. Anyway, most of Tzara I already see in Apollinaire, and it was in fact Apollinaire who established a new thread of French poetry in a time when Symbolism from the 1890s was still lingering. Apollinaire is not just a precursor of Dada, some of his poems are early Dada, and they are included in many Dada anthologies. I like Los Angeles. Talk to you later ] (]) 02:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Little Bogdan, little, little. There is so much to talk about. I was going to talk about Guillaume Apollinaire, the half-Polish half-Italian (? the identification of his father, last time I checked, was an unresolved issue, the most likely fellow was an Italian I think, Francesco Flugi d'Aspermont) born with the surname "de Kostrowitsky", a Polish surname. Kostrovitsky was his Polish though French-speaking mom's surname. He later adopted the penname Guillaume Apollinaire, his first name was Wilhelm/Guglielmo/Guillaume, while Apollinaris I think was a middle name from his mother's father. Guillaume Apollinaire was born in 1880 in Rome, he was French-educated, baptised Catholic (his mother was from the Polish Catholic background), spoke and wrote in French, started writing in his teens, his writing matured about 1898, 1899, 1900. Was heavily influenced by the Symbolists of the 1870s, 1880s and 1890s. Symbolism was at its tail-end by 1900 and there were many movements and new styles moving away from so-called Symbolism from 1900 to 1905. Apollinaire's poems went on the trail of a new modernism, away from symbolism. By the time Apollinaire published his first collection, ''Alcools'', in 1913, he had hit upon a new modern style, seen in poems such as "Zone" (1912? 1913?) and "Vendemaire" (1912? 1913?). Later he was to write some proto-Dadaist/early Dada poems, such as "Les Fenetres". I want to continue this discussion later, my info is mostly from Francis Steegmuller's 1963 biography on Apollinaire, ''Apollinaire, Poet among the Painters'', a biography that I read some from in the year 2000 but I didn't finish the book till recently. No one checks it out from the library so I can check it out pretty much whenever I want to. Most of these kinda books, ''no one is really reading them in Los Angeles and it's not just in Los Angeles that they are not being read''. It's usually as if the books are there in the libraries for me, and they are my books. Talk to you later, ] (]) 04:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Bogdan, I would lke to clone myself, and some select others, including maybe you, to create... We would replace the white trash that are found in too many (all the) states of America. They don't look European anymore. They don't have European culture. It's strange. Many of them are like hogs. I would put America in ship-shape. ] (]) 02:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Bogdan, why would you want to waste yourself with death, in the name of what you think in your youth is "most likely". But your life has been normal, and to people with normal lives it appears that death is "most likely the end". It's not. With your Dacian-Sardinians. ] (]) 04:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I've been through a lot these past years, and when I think about the planet these days I think about how glad I am that I'm from Continental Europe. I love the cultures of Continental Europe, and mixed with nowadays American culture. But so many don't mix the cultures because they have no more ties to Continental Europe.] (]) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The 4 who attacked me during that time, they were each acting on their own as far as I can tell. One of them was a mentally ill black kid from Puerto Rico who may be gay, another was a mentally ill hog kid from Tennesee who may be gay, one of them is unidentified so far, another was from a dirty island in the North Atlantic. None of them knew much about who I was because they didn't attack me at my personal account. Then I came back to Wiki and dealt with the dorks here, dorks like **** and **** and the **** who I got into a scene with at the ] article. But so far the figures at Wiki are mild. ] (]) 20:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :But what I want to talk about now is not the bad guys who almost drove me crazy, but instead the parts of life that I like, painting, writings etc. For example, some one handed Bukowski to me in late 2007 and I began reading Bukowski in early 2008. That really helped to get my mind away from those psychopaths on the internet, and helped to get my mind back in real life. Bukowski was born to a German-American father and a German mother in 1920, they brought him to L.A. as a child, and as an adult he lived a lot in the neighborhood where I grew up, and the post office where he worked most of the time is only 6 blocks away from me. A short walk. But I want to talk more about Apollinaire also, I first read some from Apollinaire I guess in 1999 or 2000. ] (]) 20:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :By the way, my part of Los Angeles is fascinating. Most of L.A. and its satellite cities are interesting. People come from Middle America and they find L.A. to be very different. Many of them then flee back to their corny states and towns. Good, they should flee. ] (]) 22:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :The year 2000, I was 19 and 20 in Los Angeles. All that "loud rock music and rap music" back then, Eminem had gotten very popular that year, while in rock nothing much was happening. Most of the same o' in the year 2000 as far as rock. In 1998 and 1999 I had distanced myself from rock and rap music, I was listening personally to no new rap in mid to late 1998 and 1999, and rock wasn't my outlet much either. My outlet, my exploration in 1998 and 1999 was mostly Rimbaud's writings, symbolism, and surrealism (Eluard, Breton, Soupault, etc.). Mostly, or in large part. That was what really got my mind into it, while the rock singers and rappers were fading away because they weren't engaging my mind/intellect enough. Religion and science didn't offer much in 1998 and 1999. Science-fiction and weird fiction was old news. I wasn't into movies much. Getting into that kind of poetry was a satisfying outlet (plus drinking alcoholic drinks, smoking marijuana etc.). Now Apollinaire in 1999 and 2000 I was just reading some of his poems that I found here & there, I could read some French back then too, but anyway I was mostly reading English translations of Apollinaire back then. Recently I found a bilingual edition of 1913's ''Alcools'' at the downtown central Library, complete aside from 3 early ones that the new edition's editor decided to leave out. I like Apollinaire's writings, he is refreshing, and he somehow mixes touches of Paul Verlaine with his own new styles. And he was the first major modern city-life poet I think, the first to include all that modernity in his style and content (Baudelaire did that for his times, and Rimbaud in his earlier phases so did others, but early 20th century big city life was not being expressed well in poetry before Apollinaire). I want to talk about how he composed that pre-Dada (1912, also pre-World War I) poem "Les fenetres" (The Windows), I'll get back to that in a minute, he composed it in Dada fashion also, his friends were suggesting lines to him at random and he incorporated some of them. I like Dada poetry by the way, I've read a nice amount of that by now. Some of my first readings of Dadaist verbal compositions were Marcel Duchamp's phrases, that was 1998 when I came across those. To me though back then (and now), I read Dadaist phrases not as a nihilist, but as a Surrealist. I was looking for the real life, the better life in those poems, I was not and am not a nihilist. Though I can't really tell a nihilist what "the meaning or purpose of human life" is, and if one sees human life as purposeless and (insert other terms here), well many do. I look for something else. ] (]) 22:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I have to return this Apollinaire biography to the library again, so I want to discuss "Les fenetres" now. In December 1912, Apollinaire wrote a poem "Les fenetres", a poem which was also functioning as a preface to the catalogue of ]'s exhibition at the gallery Der Sturm in Berlin. Apollinaire took the title "Les fenetres" from a title of one of Delaunay's paintings (Delaunay's "Les Fenetres simultanees", 1912) at the exhibition, a painting which partly inspired the content of the poem also. A friend of Apollinaire, Andre Billy, writes the following about Apollinaire's composition of "Les fenetres": "One day Apollinaire and Dupuy sat with me chez Crucifix, Rue Daunou, drinking vermouth. Suddenly Guillaume burst out laughing: he had completely forgotten to write the preface to Robert Delaunay's catalogue, which he had promised to mail that very day at the latest. "Waiter, quick, paper, pen, ink!" The three of us got the job done in no time. Guillaume began at once: "''Du rouge et vert tout le jaune se meurt''" (which is still the first line of the poem) and stopped there. Then Dupuy dictated: "''Quand chantent les aras dans le forets natales''", Apollinaire transcribed that faithfully and added: "''Abatis de pihis''" and once again he stopped. Then Andre Billy dictated "''Il y a un poeme a faire sur l'oiseau qui n'a qu'une aile''", and Apollinaire wrote that down. "It would be a good idea", Billy said, "since the matter is urgent, to send your preface as a ''message telephonique''", and that is why the next line reads: "''Nous l'enverrons en message telephonique''". Andre Billy goes on to say that Apollinaire called such poems "conversation poems". You can find the rest of Apollinaire's kinda short December 1912 poem "Les fenetres" online somewhere if you don't want to go to a library or bookstore. For more about the writing of that poem see Steegmuller's ''Apollinaire, Poet among the Painters'' pgs 236 to 239. Now when you read the poem (which I first read in 2000 or maybe 1999) then you read how it was written, you really begin to realize "Hey, that's a Dada poem before Dada." Yes, this has been said before about that Apollinaire poem and many others. It's also a Dadaistic poem written before World War I, Dadaist tendencies were stirring before WWI. I like these kind of writings, they give me the mental satisfaction, and in 1998 and 1999 such writings and paintings were my primary interest. Of course, I still like a lot of the music on the radio, I'm not nearly as disinterested in the new music as I was from mid 1998 to early 2000. That music appeals to other parts of the mind/heart, other parts of life. ] (]) 20:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Take some time to read a biography of Apollinaire, it's worth it: one can learn a lot about the art scene in pre-1919 France by reading Steegmuller's Apollinaire biography: for example, Apollinaire hung out with most of the major painters of the time. On the back of Donald Revell's translated bilingual edition of Apollinaire's ''Alcools'' (originally published in 1913 in French), they even say that ''Alcools'': "provides a key to the century's history and consciousness." Oh, Alex, they are just exaggerating, so they can sell copies of that 1995 bilingual French & English edition. No, that's not an exaggeration, it is a key. Not "the" key, obviously, but "a" key, yes. Little, little Bogdan. Read ''Alcools'' also, I liked it (although you won't find the Dadaistic poems in that 1913 collection, those were written later). By the way, L.A. public libraries are now closed two days out of the week, Mondays and Sundays. It's the latest way for the city to save money. They couldn't balance the budget yet again, but I don't recall that they've ever had to close all L.A. public libraries two days out of the week. ] (]) 03:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :i know there is a lot to read out there: and when I say "a lot to read" I'm not just referring to what you will find in a Literature section. I'm also referring to science books and mathbooks, history books etc. I have a lot of books: on a bookshelf near my bed Chekov and Truman Capote's short stories are near Rimbaud, Apollinaire and Bukowski. I keep my mathbooks on some shelves where I keep the books that I don't look through often. Precisely because there is so much to read and so much to do in this world, I am bringing Apollinaire and his writings to your attention, and his milieu also. ] (]) 21:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Little B. B, B, B. If you ever come to L.A. you may want to check out the ]. I used to go there often when I was a kid, I still go there sometimes. Very very nice assemblage of stuff, nice collections and a nice place. Check out their website. I remember when I was a kid I acquired a large new $ 50 or $ 60 fully illustrated book about the animal kingdom, one of those real cool ones with nice illustrations and detailed entries for the animals shown. I used to be into studying animal life a lot as a kid, animals of the past also, and some plants. Yes the world of science is usually fun. When I went to Bucharest I tried to go to a museum, I think it was a history museum---I went but they were closing early or something that day, or closed for renovation, that was 1994. However B science is only part of the world, and your atheist religion---not just an atheist you presumably also don't believe in an afterlife, various psychic phenomenon, etc.---is a fantasy. I'm not saying it's not an often comfortable fantasy, many people are drawn to that fantasy and they steer their minds and live their lives according to it. It's a religion. Your religion. I'm one of the few who knows how much of a fantasy religion your belief is. I didn't literally ask for that knowledge though, my life just went like that, and it wasn't easy for me to get through 2007 and 2008 and 2009. My knowledge did not come about through rigorous logic, rather through indubitable physical experiences. Physical experiences which are quite open to scientific study. And they will pass all scrutinity. ] (]) 20:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Little stupid Bogdan. Little outdated Bogdan. His 20th century brand of atheism. ] (]) 20:49, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, I have mixed feelings about Little B. On the one hand I want to tousle his ashy black hair like he's a kitten, on the other hand I want to bash him a little. It's not completely Bogdan's fault that he's so stupid. ] (]) 08:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :B is like 28 years old now. B is a grown man. B why whould I feel the need to beat you up, well B I didn't feel like beating you up back in 2005 or 2006 or early 2007. I was different in 2001, I was different in 2002, I was different in mid 2004, I was different in early 2006, I was different in mid 2006, I was different in late 2006. I don't want to detail too much about late 2006 and 2007 and early 2008 here now: B in late December 2006 and in 2007 I encountered sick psychos who were so evil and twisted it's difficult to imagine, and they crept on me during a time that is difficult to imagine also---not normal. I don't want to explain too much here, now, maybe later. Another man who was crept on by two or even 3 of the same psychos later contacted the FBI---the FBI, Bogdan, that's how bad they were. This man, who was in Tennessee at the time, managed through a series of events, to identify at least one of the psychos, he collected a lot of info, and sent the information to the FBI in 2008 or 2009, information including the psycho's name, pictures of him, his location, I think his IPs, his internet hangouts etc. and detals about what he was doing online---the man also discussed how the psycho attacked me also. I can link the man's personal websites, he's a nice guy. He was attacked by the psycho also, he believes that he was attacked worse than I was: probably, because there are many indications that that man was actually being stalked in real life by associates of the psycho or by one of the psychos, whereas the psycho's scary messages that it may be stalking me were just scare tactics. The psycho wasn't in L.A. at the time and it had no accomplices there. What happened in 2007 and early 2008 was bad, Bogdan, so much happened, and it interacted. I will write a lot more about those times at another website in the future. ] (]) 20:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Bogdan: he seems to be an atheist, he doesn't believe in any kind of afterlife, he doesn't beleive that the ideas found in Buddhism are close to being an accurate description of human reality. Bogdan stoops to pick up a flower or a baby bird out in the field: "I am close to apprehending reality", Bogdan thinks perhaps, "atheism is correct, furthermore there is no afterlife, there is no karma or dharma, I am a Bogdan and I arose from sperm and ova, sperm and ova which go back to the pre-cambrian seas of a young earth, an earth which came from an accreting proto-solar system, a sun which came from mindless physical processes in outer space, and that goes back to the Big Bang it seems, and before that..."---Something from nothing? Our conceptions, the framing of the problem according to "something" and "nothing", that framework is incorrect? "Nothing" is fantasy, because something exists? Well one can go on discussing this, but my experiences: that a mindless universe unfolded what happened in my life?---oh please little Bogdan, I haven't even told you what happened and how it happened, and how it's all backed up by evidence, because even where there isn't much evidence left I can still take polygraph tests and more accurate tests that should be available soon. ] (]) 23:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :"Well Alex, you call yourself a 007 still, right? I await your 007 adventures." ] (]) 07:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I suppose for you reading this, you don't even know what psychos I'm talking about, what they did, and why they are so appalling. Well I could easily fill you in B, but not on this talk page. ] (]) 17:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :You're so stupid little Bogdan, so unimaginative. ] (]) 20:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :What happened to you somewhere along the way? ] (]) 20:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Do you have bolts on each side of your neck? ] (]) 20:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh B, I'm sorry. How can you imagine what happened. ] (]) 07:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :That is why I want to tell you what happened. First though you should thaw more. Thaw B, thaw. You remember me from years past, I'm a nice young man, but they messed with me and occurances occured, and those occurances happened to no one else on this planet. ] (]) 20:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Little frozen Bogdan. Can I purchase a bag of little frozen Bogdans at the grocery store? Without bolts in their necks? ] (]) 02:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : They don't find it fun to communicate messages to the bogdan? Why am I posting on your talk page? Because you're Romanian and an atheist who I first encountered in late 2004? And we edited in similar fields for years? Is it because you're---well whatever reasons, for me you are fading into your shell. Little B. ] (]) 19:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey while I want to see a population reduction even from what he have now, I also want to see even more advancements in the medical sciences. The "catch" is though, sometimes a large population can speed scientific advancements, for example an article pointed out that China is poised to make rapid advancements because of the sheer number of engineers for example, that they have. We will see whether sheer numbers among the Chinese actually leads to a significant increase in discoveries and advancements. I think a factor that will check this speed of advancement among the Chinese is: inspiration/imagination: those millions and millions of Chinese may not hit upon what one guy in Switzerland or Austria may think of---because of different ways of thinking. ] (]) 19:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :How is it in Los Angeles now in 2010? I find it very crowded, though my perception that L.A. is more crowded now than it was in 2004 may partly be imagination. There are more new kids though that were born, that's for sure ;) 2004 seemed to me less populated in Los Angeles, for whatever reasons. Maybe I was in a state of mind where I just wasn't bothered by the population around me, but I think it was because: it simply was less crowded back then. By the way little B, you think you're so up on your science, well guess what B-brain, I knew since I was like 12 years old (when we used to read Weekly Reader in class or watch the Discovery channel) that the underdeveloped countries as they get developed will have less kids, but they are not going to ''stop having kids'', and their populations have already exploded---that's what I was talking about: they are not going to stop having kids. B-brain. Stop thinking that you're so up on your science and that others are not. In my case I almost fell for your little B games. ] (]) 19:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey B, how you doin'. I apologize again, these past years were the most trying so far, I didn't want my past several years to go like that. I want those years back. ] (]) 19:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Revision to ] and ] articles == | |||
| I noticed that you have revised either ] or ]. | |||
| I intend to revise those articles following the ]. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles. | |||
| Thank you. | |||
| ] (]) 03:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Translation == | |||
| Hello from Italy. Potresti aiutarci a tradurre in rumeno (per pubblicazione su WP.rumena) una pagina relativa ad un movimento artistico fondato dalla figlia del poeta Dylan Thomas ? | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/IMMAGINE%26POESIA | |||
| Fanno parte del Movimento diversi artisti della Romania. Grazie!--] (]) 16:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Universitatea-Craiova.png== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| '''PLEASE NOTE:''' | |||
| * I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. | |||
| * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. | |||
| * If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request. | |||
| * To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page. | |||
| *If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ]. | |||
| Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Hiroshima Dome 1945.gif== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 12:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Ayako Shirasaki translation? == | == Ayako Shirasaki translation? == | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 26 August 2010
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
Pantelimon
Salut, am vazut ca ai contribuit la articolul despre cartierul Pantelimon din Bucuresti (Pantelimon, Bucharest). Exista pe aceasta pagina o referinta la o poveste care se numeste "The Children's Fall" si despre care nu gasesc nimic altceva nicaieri pe Internet, ai idee despre ce este vorba si daca nu, se poate afla cine a scris despre povestea respectiva pe pagina de wikipedia?(nu ma pricep asa bine).
Banat
Please check the article on Banat. Is it posible to take this wiki in the Romanian Project?
Slim Helu
Discuss Carlos Slim on the talk page.
Blocare
Salut
Sunt User:Iaaasi blocat de tine la recomandarea lui User:Dahn si as vrea sa expun cateva idei in legatura cu sanctionarea mea.
Procesul de blocare s-a realizat ocolind procedurile clasice (WP:AIV, WP:SPI), iar totul s-a derulat rapid, fiindu-mi astfel rapita ocazia de a ma apara, drept care care as dori sa explic aici cateva aspecte. Probabil datorita reputatiei ridicate a acuzatorului am fost pedepsit fara prea multe verificari.
In primul rand incriminarea ca as User:Bonaparte (user blocat inca din 2007) mi se gratuita, intrucat, dupa cum mi-a confirmat AdiJapan, fiind vorba de contribuții foarte vechi, IP-urile lui Bonaparte nu mai sînt accesibile prin checkuser si in consecinta singurele dovezi ar fi putut fi eventuale similaritati de compartament. Andrei Stroe mi-a comunicat: Personal, nu cred că sunteţi User:Bonaparte;reafirmaţi că nu sunteţi o clonă a lui User:Bonaparte (pot să aduc şi eu argumente pentru asta).
Din cate am observat, Bonaparte a avut o conduita (ultra)nationalista si s-a concentrat in special pe teme legate de Transnistria si Rep Moldova. Eu m-am ocupat, printre altele, de "Romanian-Hungarian affairs".
In al II-lea rand recunosc ca am facut erori, dar cred ca am circumstante atenuante si imi pare rau ca sunt acuzat ca am fost de rea credinta. Imi dau seama ca am gresit grav cand mi-am pierdut cumpatul si am creat, ca act de razbunare pentru atitutdinile dupa parerea mea incorecte ale unor editori de pe WikiProject Hungary, un profil ce poate fi etichetat drept xenofobic. Este singura gafa cu adevarat majora, si o regret.
Acuzatiile lui Dahn (edits to weed out all references to dual citizenship for some Romanians and Hungarians, various forms of xenophobic edit warring, all sorts of inflammatory rants on talk pages) sunt din pacate incorecte, eu am incercat doar sa contracarez excesele anumitor useri maghiari, nu sa impun un punct de vedere ultra-nationalist.
Scurta mea activitate pe WP a fost marcata un sir de "conflicte" (pe care le pot prezenta in amanunt daca este nevoie), purtate de mine singur contragrupului de useri maghiari (Nmate, Squash Racket, Baxter9, Hobartimus, Rokarudi), dispute din care inevitabil am iesit pierzator in majoritatea cazurilor, desi dreptatea era de multe ori de partea mea. Cand intr-un final Squash Racket a incercat sa stearga numele romanesc "Gheorghe Doja" de pe articolul despre Gyorgy Dozsa si nu a putut fi convins ca procedeaza gresit, pur si simplu am cedat, si am redactat, in semn de razbunare, o pagina profil ce poate fi etichetata drept anti-maghiara (pe care am sters-o dupa o zi sau doua si care oricum nu era in acord cu parerile mele despre unguri in general)
Ulterior mi-am creat un nou cont, User:Umumu, care a fost blocat pentru sokpuppetry. Deschiderea contului clandestin nu a fost un mobil pentru a perpetua distrugeri, ci o modalitate de a continua realizarea de contributii constructive dupa o pedeapsa pe care am socotit-o nedreapta.
Sper ca o sa se rezolve situatia intr-un mod fericit si o sa primesc o a doua sansa. Te rog mult sa-mi dai un raspuns, oricat de scurt, macar cat sa stiu ca ai parcurs acest mesaj.
Ayako Shirasaki translation?
Hello Bogdan, I know that you are an admin and very busy. Do you know someone or can do it yourself? I need a translation for the english article of Ayako Shirasaki to italian. Would be so great if you could help :) Yours, Jan --JanMatthiesMM (talk) 23:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)