| Revision as of 20:50, 1 May 2004 editMr-Natural-Health (talk | contribs)4,184 edits {{msg:CamNotice}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:35, 22 May 2004 edit undoMr-Natural-Health (talk | contribs)4,184 edits Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicineNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| It was actually me, Lumos3, who created this page but somehow I became logged off during the session and it didnt get recorded. | It was actually me, Lumos3, who created this page but somehow I became logged off during the session and it didnt get recorded. | ||
| == Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine == | |||
| My preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine is totally unfavorable. | |||
| The primary problem seems to be that this article is nothing but a stub article hiding behind a lot of verbiage. Major portions of the Orthomolecular medicine viewpoint are simply not documented in this article. I got absolutely nothing out of this article other than a bunch of commonly held generalities.. | |||
| The article states: ''The substances may be administered by diet, dietary supplementation or intravenously,'' for example. What is that supposed to mean? I have no idea. As far as I know, diet has absolutely nothing to do with Orthomolecular medicine. Intravenous treatments would seem to require professionalized care, while dietary supplementation says self-care. | |||
| This article totally fails SQG#3. The proponent's viewpoint is largely missing. No wonder that opponents have yet to attack this article. There is nothing to prove or attack as it is presently written. -- ] 23:35, 22 May 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:35, 22 May 2004
It was actually me, Lumos3, who created this page but somehow I became logged off during the session and it didnt get recorded.
Preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine
My preliminary review of Orthomolecular medicine is totally unfavorable.
The primary problem seems to be that this article is nothing but a stub article hiding behind a lot of verbiage. Major portions of the Orthomolecular medicine viewpoint are simply not documented in this article. I got absolutely nothing out of this article other than a bunch of commonly held generalities..
The article states: The substances may be administered by diet, dietary supplementation or intravenously, for example. What is that supposed to mean? I have no idea. As far as I know, diet has absolutely nothing to do with Orthomolecular medicine. Intravenous treatments would seem to require professionalized care, while dietary supplementation says self-care.
This article totally fails SQG#3. The proponent's viewpoint is largely missing. No wonder that opponents have yet to attack this article. There is nothing to prove or attack as it is presently written. -- John Gohde 23:35, 22 May 2004 (UTC)