Revision as of 23:08, 10 September 2010 editNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,157 editsm →legality← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:18, 10 September 2010 edit undoYnhockey (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators66,999 edits →legality: commentNext edit → |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
::*: ''the heavily fortified illegal Jewish settlement of Psagot.'' |
|
::*: ''the heavily fortified illegal Jewish settlement of Psagot.'' |
|
::Unless you have a valid reason for removing the only sourced piece of information in this article I will be returning the line. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 23:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)</font></small> |
|
::Unless you have a valid reason for removing the only sourced piece of information in this article I will be returning the line. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 23:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)</font></small> |
|
|
:::Please explain how inserting a superfluous line (or two) about the general legality of Israeli settlements into a two-line article about Psagot does not constitute undue weight. —] <sup>(])</sup> 23:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC) |
Could somebody explain what is "POV" or "undue" about the only referenced piece of information in this entire article? A certain editor, who we can all guess what their previous username was, has removed it on those grounds. nableezy - 17:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)