| Revision as of 01:31, 12 September 2010 editBehnamFarid (talk | contribs)6,317 edits ←Created page with '== On the Cyrus Cylinder == Right now I have no time to inspect what you have and what you have not done to the above-mentioned entry, but you must have at leas...' | Revision as of 07:20, 12 September 2010 edit undoL'ecrivant (talk | contribs)218 edits Welcome messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{welcome}} | |||
| == On the ] == | == On the ] == | ||
| Right now I have no time to inspect what you have and what you have not done to the above-mentioned entry, but you must have at least checked and realized that your changes have caused the reference list of this entry to become corrupt. It is the height of irresponsibility just to come along and wreck an entry exactly in your manner. In point of fact, you must have used the talk page of the entry and by writing a reasoned argument and giving an appropriate list of references tried to build a consensus amongst various editors before effecting your changes to the entry. The mere claim that some historians are not competent enough is very personal and cannot be the basis for wrecking an entry. In view of all these, I will revert your edits forthwith. I hereby invite you to raise your objections to the present contents of the entry in the talk page of this entry, providing us, all of the editors who in one way or another have been involved in the writing and editing of this entry, with some background information in support of your arguments. Since you are a newcomer to Misplaced Pages, I feel compelled to point out that major changes to Misplaced Pages entries are effected by consensus, and consensus is achieved through making use of the space provided by the talk pages attached to entries. With kind regards,]. | Right now I have no time to inspect what you have and what you have not done to the above-mentioned entry, but you must have at least checked and realized that your changes have caused the reference list of this entry to become corrupt. It is the height of irresponsibility just to come along and wreck an entry exactly in your manner. In point of fact, you must have used the talk page of the entry and by writing a reasoned argument and giving an appropriate list of references tried to build a consensus amongst various editors before effecting your changes to the entry. The mere claim that some historians are not competent enough is very personal and cannot be the basis for wrecking an entry. In view of all these, I will revert your edits forthwith. I hereby invite you to raise your objections to the present contents of the entry in the talk page of this entry, providing us, all of the editors who in one way or another have been involved in the writing and editing of this entry, with some background information in support of your arguments. Since you are a newcomer to Misplaced Pages, I feel compelled to point out that major changes to Misplaced Pages entries are effected by consensus, and consensus is achieved through making use of the space provided by the talk pages attached to entries. With kind regards,]. | ||
Revision as of 07:20, 12 September 2010
Welcome!
Hi Ghotbi.m.j! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
On the Cyrus Cylinder
Right now I have no time to inspect what you have and what you have not done to the above-mentioned entry, but you must have at least checked and realized that your changes have caused the reference list of this entry to become corrupt. It is the height of irresponsibility just to come along and wreck an entry exactly in your manner. In point of fact, you must have used the talk page of the entry and by writing a reasoned argument and giving an appropriate list of references tried to build a consensus amongst various editors before effecting your changes to the entry. The mere claim that some historians are not competent enough is very personal and cannot be the basis for wrecking an entry. In view of all these, I will revert your edits forthwith. I hereby invite you to raise your objections to the present contents of the entry in the talk page of this entry, providing us, all of the editors who in one way or another have been involved in the writing and editing of this entry, with some background information in support of your arguments. Since you are a newcomer to Misplaced Pages, I feel compelled to point out that major changes to Misplaced Pages entries are effected by consensus, and consensus is achieved through making use of the space provided by the talk pages attached to entries. With kind regards,--BF 01:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC).