| Revision as of 15:46, 13 September 2010 editNigelj (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,869 edits →Even longer: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:47, 13 September 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →Even longer: It is indeed much longer than I remembered.Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| In you could have linked earlier, the discussion there started at ] and went right through. Quite extraordinary that people want to start it up again. --] (]) 15:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | In you could have linked earlier, the discussion there started at ] and went right through. Quite extraordinary that people want to start it up again. --] (]) 15:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Yes, feel free to adjust the link. It is indeed much longer than I remembered. --] 15:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:47, 13 September 2010
User talk:Tony Sidaway/Notices
Even longer
In this edit you could have linked earlier, the discussion there started at Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/Proposed decision#Proposed FoF: GregJackP has been disruptive and went right through. Quite extraordinary that people want to start it up again. --Nigelj (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, feel free to adjust the link. It is indeed much longer than I remembered. --TS 15:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)