| Revision as of 16:13, 5 November 2007 edit80.41.132.125 (talk) not mick jagger← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:03, 16 September 2010 edit undo173.76.31.74 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *Fannish tone. | *Fannish tone. | ||
| *After cleanup, improve to good article status. | *After cleanup, improve to good article status. | ||
| *unlike many articles for major musical artists, this page has no section about legacy or influence. | |||
| Not sure if this is the correct place for this but the paragraph starting with Some tracks (including "Brown Sugar" and "]") in 69-74 section needs sorting - for some reason i cant save any changes!!!!!!!1 thanks | Not sure if this is the correct place for this but the paragraph starting with Some tracks (including "Brown Sugar" and "]") in 69-74 section needs sorting - for some reason i cant save any changes!!!!!!!1 thanks | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 16 September 2010
- the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
- all images need sources and fair use rationales.
The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone- the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existed- Fannish tone.
- After cleanup, improve to good article status.
- unlike many articles for major musical artists, this page has no section about legacy or influence.
Not sure if this is the correct place for this but the paragraph starting with Some tracks (including "Brown Sugar" and "You Gotta Move") in 69-74 section needs sorting - for some reason i cant save any changes!!!!!!!1 thanks