Revision as of 04:07, 17 September 2010 editDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators349,556 edits Revert to July 15 2010 version to restore missing content← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:58, 18 September 2010 edit undo180.149.53.4 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|colspan="6" align="center"|'''<font size=3>]</font>'''<br> | |colspan="6" align="center"|'''<font size=3>]</font>'''<br> | ||
|- bgcolor="#FFEEB3" | |- bgcolor="#FFEEB3" | ||
| ] || 1510–1961 | | ] || 1510–1961 {is this correct????} | ||
|- bgcolor="#FFEEB3" | |- bgcolor="#FFEEB3" | ||
| ] || 1605–1825 | | ] || 1605–1825 |
Revision as of 06:58, 18 September 2010
This template has been designed so that it can be used both in articles that adopt the BC/AD date notation and those that adopt the BCE/CE date notation without forcing some articles to have inconsistent style.
It will display BCE/CE notation unless the template gives the parameter BC a value. For instance {{Colonial India}} will give BCE/CE notation, {{Colonial India|BC=1}} will give BC/AD notation.
It can be edited as normal, but with the following exception:
- Instead of writing BCE or BC write {{#if: {{{BC|}}}|BC|BCE}}
- Instead of writing CE or AD write {{#if: {{{BC|}}}|AD|CE}}
This functionality is necessitated by the Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style requirement that BC-AD and BCE-CE do not both appear in the same article.
Colonial India | |||||
Portuguese India | 1510–1961 {is this correct????} | ||||
Dutch India | 1605–1825 | ||||
Danish India | 1696–1869 | ||||
French India | 1759–1954 | ||||
British India 1613–1947 | |||||
East India Company | 1612–1757 | ||||
Company rule in India | 1757–1857 | ||||
British Raj | 1858–1947 | ||||
British rule in Burma | 1824–1867 | ||||
Princely states | 1765–1947 | ||||
Partition of India | 1947 | ||||