Misplaced Pages

Talk:Waiting for the End: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:10, 5 October 2010 editFriginator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers14,892 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:12, 5 October 2010 edit undoFriginator (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers14,892 edits Gone.Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: ] and ] --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC) There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: ] and ] --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


:Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like ]. From the revision history, it looks like ] and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). ] (]) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC) <s>:Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like ]. From the revision history, it looks like ] and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). ] (]) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


::Okay, it looks like ] added a speedy deletion template to ]. I left a message on his talk page about it. I still think it should be a redirect instead, to avoid potential confusion. ] (]) 20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC) ::Okay, it looks like ] added a speedy deletion template to ]. I left a message on his talk page about it. I still think it should be a redirect instead, to avoid potential confusion. ] (]) 20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</s>

Looks like it was just deleted. ] (]) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:12, 5 October 2010

Notability

The song charted, even before released as a single officially.

http://www.billboard.com/#/song/linkin-park/waiting-for-the-end/22634911

Two articles

There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: Waiting for the End and Waiting for the End (song) --Djlordi 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

:Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). From the revision history, it looks like Kevon100 and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). Friginator (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Okay, it looks like Kevon100 added a speedy deletion template to Waiting for the End (song). I left a message on his talk page about it. I still think it should be a redirect instead, to avoid potential confusion. Friginator (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Looks like it was just deleted. Friginator (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)