| Revision as of 13:36, 6 October 2010 editEvilgohan2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,866 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:37, 6 October 2010 edit undoEvilgohan2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,866 editsm →Two articlesNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Looks like it was just deleted. ] (]) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | Looks like it was just deleted. ] (]) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::There's actually three. Someone decided to create ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | :::There's actually three. Someone decided to create ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 6 October 2010
Notability
The song charted, even before released as a single officially.
http://www.billboard.com/#/song/linkin-park/waiting-for-the-end/22634911
Two articles
There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: Waiting for the End and Waiting for the End (song) --Djlordi 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
:Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). From the revision history, it looks like Kevon100 and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). Friginator (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Okay, it looks like Kevon100 added a speedy deletion template to Waiting for the End (song). I left a message on his talk page about it. I still think it should be a redirect instead, to avoid potential confusion. Friginator (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Looks like it was just deleted. Friginator (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- There's actually three. Someone decided to create Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 13:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)