| Revision as of 23:20, 7 October 2010 editLimongi (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,988 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:51, 8 October 2010 edit undoStarblind (talk | contribs)Administrators17,274 edits →Numeracy in Latin AmericaNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete.''' This is an essay rather than an article. (FYI, you'll find my name in the History as starting this article. I only completed the transition of this article from its previous existence as a category. See ].)--] (]) 23:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete.''' This is an essay rather than an article. (FYI, you'll find my name in the History as starting this article. I only completed the transition of this article from its previous existence as a category. See ].)--] (]) 23:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Reads like an essay/]. There are no ] to support ]. ] (]) 23:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Reads like an essay/]. There are no ] to support ]. ] (]) 23:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' not just an essay, but worse, a POV opinion piece. ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 02:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:51, 8 October 2010
Numeracy in Latin America
- Numeracy in Latin America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD declined. Essay that is a classic example of WP:NOT. Ray 20:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. -- Ray 20:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Ray 20:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is an essay - it seems to be a pretty good article, and tells you lots of things about numeracy in Latin America. If it can be improved, it should be, otherwise it is fine how it is. Look at http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Numeracy+in+Latin+America%22 - there are plenty of people talking about Numeracy in Latin America, and deleting this article will not help increase the amount of knowledge on the subject Numeracy in Latin America seeing as the article contains useful information. there is also a need for the article to be improved so it looks like a standard wikipedia article with pictures and so forth, but that can be done by anyone. I will be making some changes to the article. Nooba booba sooba looba (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. This is an essay rather than an article. (FYI, you'll find my name in the History as starting this article. I only completed the transition of this article from its previous existence as a category. See Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_20#Category:Numeracy_in_Latin_America.)--Mike Selinker (talk) 23:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like an essay/OR. There are no reliable sources to support notability. Limongi (talk) 23:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete not just an essay, but worse, a POV opinion piece. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)