| Revision as of 15:46, 10 October 2010 editVodomar (talk | contribs)313 editsm →copy&paste moves← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:18, 11 October 2010 edit undoTaivoLinguist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers32,239 edits →copy&paste movesNext edit → | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
| :: I am not just resorting to reading the text and looking for citations that are missing. I will not add new text. ] (]) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | :: I am not just resorting to reading the text and looking for citations that are missing. I will not add new text. ] (]) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Many of the statements that are made in the article are quite bold and to stand they need to be properly referenced, otherwise this looks like original research not a proper encyclopedic article. ] (]) 15:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ::: Many of the statements that are made in the article are quite bold and to stand they need to be properly referenced, otherwise this looks like original research not a proper encyclopedic article. ] (]) 15:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| === Notice of ] === | |||
| Please note that the article ] and other articles relating to the Balkans fall under the ruling of ]. Note in particular ], which states | |||
| :"Any uninvolved administrator may, on their own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the ] if that editor fails to adhere to the ], the ], or the ]. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; restrictions on reverts; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision." | |||
| Repeated blanket reversions, repeatedly and knowingly restoring material with large amounts of poor English and grammatical errors, and repeated introduction of material rejected by consensus all fall below the expected standards of behaviour at this project. ] (]) 23:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:18, 11 October 2010
Welcome
|
Please see
...Talk:Croatian War of Independence and my comments to the bottom. It cannot be compared to the American War of Independence - as Croatia was not fighting to gain its independence throughout the majority during the war (unlike the U.S.), but fighting against a seperatists' War of Independence. --HolyRomanEmperor 12:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Very funny, HRE call it what you like - it will still be Croatian War of Independence, and by the same token, this is a quote: "...Colonists were divided over which side to support in the war; in some areas, the struggle was a civil war. The Revolutionaries (also known as "Americans" or "Patriots") had the active support of about 40 to 45 percent of the colonial population. About 15 to 20 percent of the population supported the British Crown during the war and were known as Loyalists (or Tories). " taken from American_Revolutionary_War#Armies.2C_militias.2C_and_mercenaries. So the independece was not supported by the majority as you have stated above. So by taking simple reasoning, by your definition and statements made above the would fit what happened in the US: a separatists War of Independece . Vodomar 00:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? All I was trying to say is that RSK fought for its independence against Croatia; and not stop Croatia from receiving its independence (which was already bygone received). --HolyRomanEmperor 09:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- I did see that. The signee was an IP address, so I did not consider it coming from you. Vodomar 21:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Notability of Cardinal Stepinac Village
A tag has been placed on Cardinal Stepinac Village, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — coelacan — 02:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hanging in NDH
I've noticed you left an entry at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hanging in NDH, but it is not entirely clear whether it was meant as a comment or a vote. Could you precede your entry with an appropriate text (Comment or Delete - as I gather that Keep is out of the question)? GregorB 21:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Mark Spencer (Australia)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Spencer (Australia), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mark Spencer (Australia). B. Wolterding (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Zdravo kolega
Ako ti se da pliz, pogledaj malo gramatiku i pravopis u ovom članku prije nego ga stavim na stranu. Pozdrav --Lasta (talk) 13:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Gradiščanščina
Zdravo! Sem videl, da so prestavili članek gradiščanskega jezika, ampak to ni res. Ker jaz sem študent v Sombotelu, tam pa je lektorica kroatistike prav tako Gradiščanka, ki je rekla da uradno gradiščanščina tudi jezik. In na fakulteti malo študirajo gradiščansko. Doncsecz 13:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
copy&paste moves
Please don't move pages by copying and pasting. It messes up the page history. If you're unable to move a page, ask, or post a request for move.
I moved it to "Burgenland Croatian" to sidestep the issue. — kwami (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Cool ! Vodomar (talk) 14:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Also, just a warning, it looks like you might be violating WP:3RR on Serbo-Croatian language. (I haven't compared all your edits, but it looks problematic on the surface.) The wording of the lede was discussed rather extensively on the talk page, so it would probably be best to take it up there. — kwami (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I am not just resorting to reading the text and looking for citations that are missing. I will not add new text. Vodomar (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Many of the statements that are made in the article are quite bold and to stand they need to be properly referenced, otherwise this looks like original research not a proper encyclopedic article. Vodomar (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I am not just resorting to reading the text and looking for citations that are missing. I will not add new text. Vodomar (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Notice of WP:ARBMAC
Please note that the article Croatian language and other articles relating to the Balkans fall under the ruling of WP:ARBMAC. Note in particular Misplaced Pages:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions, which states
- "Any uninvolved administrator may, on their own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if that editor fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, the expected standards of behavior, or the normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; restrictions on reverts; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision."
Repeated blanket reversions, repeatedly and knowingly restoring material with large amounts of poor English and grammatical errors, and repeated introduction of material rejected by consensus all fall below the expected standards of behaviour at this project. Kubura (talk) 23:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)