| Revision as of 18:09, 15 October 2010 editDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Oversighters, Administrators263,788 edits →Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change: fixed sanctions link← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 15 October 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Verbal/Archive 2, User talk:Verbal/Archive 3.Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Verbal/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Verbal/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Regarding tags you placed on "Licefreee!"article == | |||
| Hello Verbal, | |||
| You have tagged and retagged ], asserting that it reads like a press release. (It's not a press release, it's just a stub article.) Within the article is a referenced sentence regarding the disputed efficacy of homeopathic preparations. In your view what is needed for you to remove those tags? Additionally, the notability tag. What criteria are you using? In my view the product is notable for being an insecticide which is wholly non-toxic to humans, for being an Oregon product, and for having a decent market share of the head-lice prep market. Please, let me know how to improve this stub. ] (]) 15:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Medation == | |||
| Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Shakespeare_authorship_question. I have archived the rest of the page and this page will be the main page for this mediation ''']''' <sup>]</sup>|<sup>]</sup> 11:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == What's up with this? == | == What's up with this? == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 21: | ||
| Verbal, in case you haven't seen, Roger Davies posted at the Climate Change Proposed Decision talk page on the subject of evidence sub-pages in user space. I thought you might want to know about it, and possibly also to look at the remedy on sub-pages that is proposed. ] (]) 10:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC) | Verbal, in case you haven't seen, Roger Davies posted at the Climate Change Proposed Decision talk page on the subject of evidence sub-pages in user space. I thought you might want to know about it, and possibly also to look at the remedy on sub-pages that is proposed. ] (]) 10:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == | ||
| ] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | ] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! | ||
| Line 89: | Line 79: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted: | This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted: | ||
Revision as of 19:53, 15 October 2010
What's up with this?
User:Verbal/userboxes/ARSbackfire - Why did you have this restored to your userspace? SnottyWong 19:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bump. (So your bot doesn't archive it) SnottyWong 15:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bump again. Where've you been? SnottyWong 20:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
RfAr: Climate change
This is inform you that a finding of fact has been proposed about you here. Roger Davies 04:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- And emailed. Roger Davies 04:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Recent comment from Roger Davies
Verbal, in case you haven't seen, Roger Davies posted this at the Climate Change Proposed Decision talk page on the subject of evidence sub-pages in user space. I thought you might want to know about it, and possibly also to look at the remedy on sub-pages that is proposed. EdChem (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
- A specially-tailored version of discretionary sanctions is authorized for the entire topic area of climate change. Enforcement requests are to be submitted to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, which is to replace Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement.
- Experienced administrators, and especially checkusers, are requested to closely monitor new accounts that edit inappropriately in the topic area.
- Within seven days of this remedy passing, all parties must either delete evidence sub-pages or request deletion of them.
- The following editors are banned from the topic area of climate change, and may not appeal this ban until at least six months after the closure of this case (and no more often than every three months thereafter);
- William M. Connolley
- Polargeo
- Thegoodlocust
- Marknutley
- ChrisO
- Minor4th
- ATren
- Hipocrite
- Cla68
- GregJackP
- A Quest For Knowledge
- Verbal
- ZuluPapa5
- JohnWBarber
- FellGleaming
- The following users have accepted binding voluntary topic bans;
- The following administrators are explicitly restricted from applying discretionary sanctions as authorized in this case, as is any other administrator fitting the description of an involved administrator;
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
Dougweller (talk) 18:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)