Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Heymid: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:28, 18 October 2010 editHalfShadow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,876 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit Revision as of 23:37, 18 October 2010 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,084 edits CU resultsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} {{SPI case status|checked}}


<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
Line 30: Line 30:


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
{{likely}}. AIK IF 2010 was using an open proxy, but user agents are similar. –] 23:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

---- ----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 23:37, 18 October 2010

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Heymid

Heymid (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Heymid/Archive.


18 October 2010
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by TFOWR

This edit (by AIK IF 2010, prior edit was by Heymid, edit summaries identical), AIK IF 2010's other edits are mostly to Heymid's talkpage.

This is currently at WP:ANI, and both editors are now indefinitely blocked. I don't feel entirely comfortable with this: the time this occurred is (slightly) outside Heymid's usual times for editing. I'd like confirmation that this was genuine socking and not "false-socking". TFOWR 23:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
  • Could be the false flag sockmaster who has impersonated other users already in a bit of hot water, in an attempt to reach the boiling point, so I would like to see this checked. –xeno 23:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I've seen "false-flagging" done at least three times before and am the one who originally suggested a CU in the ANI topic in question; it can't hurt to be sure. HalfShadow 23:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Likely. AIK IF 2010 was using an open proxy, but user agents are similar. –MuZemike 23:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Categories: