| Revision as of 17:09, 20 October 2010 view sourceScottyBerg (talk | contribs)12,729 edits →Harassment: postscript and strikeout← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:38, 23 October 2010 view source MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:GregJackP/Archive 8.Next edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ::I just wanted to belatedly strike out most of my post above. While I'm sympathetic to GJP, I just don't know the facts. Let it go by saying that it's mysterious. ] (]) 17:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ::I just wanted to belatedly strike out most of my post above. While I'm sympathetic to GJP, I just don't know the facts. Let it go by saying that it's mysterious. ] (]) 17:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == ] nomination of ] == | ||
| == ] == | |||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted: | |||
| * A ] of ] is authorized for the entire topic area of climate change. Enforcement requests are to be submitted to ], which is to replace ]. | |||
| * Experienced administrators, and especially checkusers, are requested to closely monitor new accounts that edit inappropriately in the topic area. | |||
| * Within seven days of this remedy passing, all parties must either delete evidence sub-pages or ] of them. | |||
| * The following editors are banned from the topic area of climate change, and may not appeal this ban until at least six months after the closure of this case (and no more often than every three months thereafter); | |||
| <div style="margin-left: 4em;">{{div col|cols=3}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{div col end}}</div> | |||
| * The following users have accepted binding voluntary topic bans; | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| * The following administrators are explicitly restricted from applying discretionary sanctions as authorized in this case, as is any other administrator fitting the ]; | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,<br/> ] (]) 18:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ==] nomination of ]== | ||
| ] {{Quote box | ] {{Quote box | ||
| | quote = If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ]. | | quote = If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ]. | ||
Revision as of 14:38, 23 October 2010
| This is GregJackP's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Please add new posts at the bottom of the page.
Article Posted for AFD
Nomination of Texas Disposal Systems Landfill v. Waste Management Holding for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Texas Disposal Systems Landfill v. Waste Management Holding, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Texas Disposal Systems Landfill v. Waste Management Holding until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..
Harassment
I happened to see the thread...by chance, because I usually avoid that cesspool. I should have said this at the time, but better late than never - that harassment was reprehensible. I'm sorry it happened, I'm sorry that your association with Misplaced Pages brought you to the attention of that crowd, and I hate the fact that Misplaced Pages does nothing to protect editors against harassment if people have the sense to move it off-wiki. Guettarda (talk) 00:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Greg can't edit his talk page because he was blocked and his talk page and email access was cut off. He asked me to tell you that he appreciates your message a great deal and although there were times you were on differing sides of the issues he has always found you to be articulate and fair. He wishes you the best on Wiki and elsewhere. (By the way, I have retired from Wiki and don't intend to continue editing, but I made this post at Greg's request. I expect I will now too be blocked for delivering this thank you note.). Best, Minor4th 01:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- This whole thing is very mysterious.
I've seen references to it in various places and have no idea what it is about. Reading between the lines, it seems as if GJP made a "legal threat" (whatever that means) in an email. I don't see anything on-wiki so that might be what happened. If so, he should be permitted the opportunity to withdraw that alleged threat and continue to edit Misplaced Pages. He has been more harshly dealt with than any other editor in the CC case, and there is no evident reason for that. I surmise he may have been acting emotionally in reaction to the "harassment" (which, again, I have no idea what that means). An indefinite ban seems harsh, and removing his ability to email makes it impossible for him to rectify the situation if he so wished.ScottyBerg (talk) 14:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- This whole thing is very mysterious.
- I just wanted to belatedly strike out most of my post above. While I'm sympathetic to GJP, I just don't know the facts. Let it go by saying that it's mysterious. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Va601cc
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:Va601cc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)