| Revision as of 03:37, 15 October 2010 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Undid revision 390790574 by 24.95.92.103 (talk← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:14, 26 October 2010 edit undoOcaasi (talk | contribs)Administrators37,090 edits →Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| {{Archives}} | {{Archives}} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity == | |||
| Ludwigs suggested the FAQ might need to be brought in line with recent changes to NPOV. I wanted to just do a non-policy clean-up first to get a better idea of what we were dealing with. I generally just shortened phrases and clarified the language to be more direct. I left ASF and Pseudoscience alone, since they are more touchy at the moment. QG made the comment that the FAQ had been "weakened", but I think that is a misreading of the change. I'm curious if there are some more specific comments or other observations. ] (]) 05:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:14, 26 October 2010
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Rewrite/Copy-edit for Brevity, Clarity
Ludwigs suggested the FAQ might need to be brought in line with recent changes to NPOV. I wanted to just do a non-policy clean-up first to get a better idea of what we were dealing with. I generally just shortened phrases and clarified the language to be more direct. I left ASF and Pseudoscience alone, since they are more touchy at the moment. QG made the comment that the FAQ had been "weakened", but I think that is a misreading of the change. I'm curious if there are some more specific comments or other observations. Ocaasi (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)