Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hodja Nasreddin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:59, 27 October 2010 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,754 edits On the subject of sticks: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 04:29, 27 October 2010 edit undoHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits Re to Piotrus: If Arbcom will not support you, what me and others can expect?Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


I quite agree. See ]. Thank you for your comment, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 02:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC) I quite agree. See ]. Thank you for your comment, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 02:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

:I am looking at your request as a benchmark case. What do they expect from editors topic-banned in RB, CC and other cases? You was very productive, edited boring stuff, was not involved in any controversy, and you understand the problems and related policies (as very much clear from your comments). If Arbcom will not support you, what me and others can expect? And I am sure that people are watching. Arbitrators probably suspect that you are not sincere. But that can be said about everyone else. Besides, what difference does it make if someone follows the rules because he is now a different person or because he does not want to be a subject of sanctions? ] (]) 04:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:29, 27 October 2010

Template:ExamsDIRlong

On the subject of sticks

I quite agree. See here. Thank you for your comment, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 02:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I am looking at your request as a benchmark case. What do they expect from editors topic-banned in RB, CC and other cases? You was very productive, edited boring stuff, was not involved in any controversy, and you understand the problems and related policies (as very much clear from your comments). If Arbcom will not support you, what me and others can expect? And I am sure that people are watching. Arbitrators probably suspect that you are not sincere. But that can be said about everyone else. Besides, what difference does it make if someone follows the rules because he is now a different person or because he does not want to be a subject of sanctions? Biophys (talk) 04:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)