Revision as of 09:39, 8 November 2010 editDsp13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers103,591 edits agree← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:41, 8 November 2010 edit undoDsp13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers103,591 edits caveatNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. ] (]) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. ] (]) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:yes, definitely agree. ] (]) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | :yes, definitely agree. ] (]) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired befpre doping anything else? ] (]) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:41, 8 November 2010
The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- yes, definitely agree. Dsp13 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired befpre doping anything else? Dsp13 (talk) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)