Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rlevse: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:11, 8 November 2010 view sourceGoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers492,924 edits →ANI← Previous edit Revision as of 12:11, 8 November 2010 view source GoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers492,924 editsm →ANINext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
::: I agree with Off2riorob, at least focus on commons (where I'm mostly focusing on right now) and let the drama here calm down, it brought to issue a serious concern on Misplaced Pages. We are not a lynch squad, even though some people are acting like one. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC) ::: I agree with Off2riorob, at least focus on commons (where I'm mostly focusing on right now) and let the drama here calm down, it brought to issue a serious concern on Misplaced Pages. We are not a lynch squad, even though some people are acting like one. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
::: Per Off2riorob; he has said it better than I could. This incident has sparked ongoing discussions at ] and on Jimbo's talk page about what plagiarism means in the context of writing an encyclopedia, as opposed to writing a thesis, and there is a pretty clear consensus that "plagiarism" should not be a stick to beat editors with. Stick around, things will work out. --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>''' 03:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC) ::: Per Off2riorob; he has said it better than I could. This incident has sparked ongoing discussions at ] and on Jimbo's talk page about what plagiarism means in the context of writing an encyclopedia, as opposed to writing a thesis, and there is a pretty clear consensus that "plagiarism" should not be a stick to beat editors with. Stick around, things will work out. --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>''' 03:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
:The plagerism & copyviolation stuff, was largerly irrelevant to me. My main concern was the complaints over your talkpage being protected & your status being changed from 'retirement' to 'indef weki-break'. ] (]) 12:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC) :The plagerism & copyviolation stuff, was largerly irrelevant to me. My main concern was the complaints over your talkpage being protected & your status being changed from 'retirement' to 'indef wiki-break'. ] (]) 12:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:11, 8 November 2010

Rlevse is on indefinite wikibreak.

ANI

Dear Rlevse, I am very happy that it seems that you are editing again. I am also sorry to have to informa you that large parts of wikipedia is still as crazy as when you decided to take a break and this is clearly visible in this thread at ani that discusses some issues regarding you - I am not sure exactly what it is they are going on about, it doesn't seem to be very relevant in my opinion, but I thought at least you should have the courtesy of being informed. Best. ·Maunus·ƛ· 01:30, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, but it doesn't matter. Trying to come back was a mistake. I'm sorry for all the trouble I've caused, as I said in my stmt before, I had no intent to deceive anyone nor not follow policy. My error was in not being able to keep up with changes. I won't be bothering anyone anymore, I've asked Avraham to RTV me here and on Commons. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Peace to all. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry to hear this. No, contrary to what some people may think, I don't have something against you; the arguments I've made at ANI are about my firm belief the community needs to have the chance to resolve the issue, not because I want you grilled. Rlevse, whatever faults you had, you've also done a lot of good for Misplaced Pages and I really am sorry to see you go. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 01:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back Rlevse, listen .. its not the wikicrime of the century, from the discussion I have seen over the last few days there are many people with differing opinions and understanding of what is and what is not a copy vio and plagiarism and such like. Stay and have a chat about it and it will all get worked out, many people were missing you. You have already handed in your tools and fair play to you for that, hang around, work it out and be a simple contributor, you know you want to... Off2riorob (talk) 01:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree with Off2riorob, at least focus on commons (where I'm mostly focusing on right now) and let the drama here calm down, it brought to issue a serious concern on Misplaced Pages. We are not a lynch squad, even though some people are acting like one. Secret 02:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Per Off2riorob; he has said it better than I could. This incident has sparked ongoing discussions at WT:Plagiarism and on Jimbo's talk page about what plagiarism means in the context of writing an encyclopedia, as opposed to writing a thesis, and there is a pretty clear consensus that "plagiarism" should not be a stick to beat editors with. Stick around, things will work out. --JN466 03:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
The plagerism & copyviolation stuff, was largerly irrelevant to me. My main concern was the complaints over your talkpage being protected & your status being changed from 'retirement' to 'indef wiki-break'. GoodDay (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)