Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Cite ODNB: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:41, 8 November 2010 editDsp13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers103,591 edits caveat← Previous edit Revision as of 13:28, 8 November 2010 edit undoCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,292 edits not so many places to fix, fortunatelyNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. ] (]) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC) The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. ] (]) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
:yes, definitely agree. ] (]) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC) :yes, definitely agree. ] (]) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
:agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired befpre doping anything else? ] (]) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC) :agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired before doing anything else? ] (]) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. ] (]) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:28, 8 November 2010

The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

yes, definitely agree. Dsp13 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired before doing anything else? Dsp13 (talk) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)