| Revision as of 13:28, 8 November 2010 editCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,292 edits not so many places to fix, fortunately← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 8 November 2010 edit undoDsp13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers103,591 edits good!Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. ] (]) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. ] (]) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :pleased to hear I'd got my wires crossed!] (]) 20:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:14, 8 November 2010
The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- yes, definitely agree. Dsp13 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired before doing anything else? Dsp13 (talk) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- pleased to hear I'd got my wires crossed!Dsp13 (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)