| Revision as of 20:14, 8 November 2010 editDsp13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers103,591 edits good!← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:24, 10 November 2010 edit undoCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,292 edits done and checkedNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. ] (]) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. ] (]) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :pleased to hear I'd got my wires crossed!] (]) 20:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | :pleased to hear I'd got my wires crossed!] (]) 20:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Done, and I've made a pass through all the places where the template is used. ] (]) 08:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:24, 10 November 2010
The leading bullet here seems non-standard, and a bit awkward for use in footnotes. I'd like to remove it before matters go further. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- yes, definitely agree. Dsp13 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- agree that it should be done, anyway. If it is removed early will the 8K pages using it at present need to be repaired before doing anything else? Dsp13 (talk) 09:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
It's not on 8,000 pages! Currently fewer than 100 occurrences by what links to the template page. So it's manageable by hand right now. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- pleased to hear I'd got my wires crossed!Dsp13 (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Done, and I've made a pass through all the places where the template is used. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)