Misplaced Pages

User talk:Woohookitty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:51, 15 November 2010 editBrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,942,733 edits Master of Arts disambiguation: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 17:56, 15 November 2010 edit undoDavidOaks (talk | contribs)6,973 edits Folk etymology: Your input requested: new sectionNext edit →
Line 56: Line 56:


was the wrong disambiguation. An ] is essentially a primary degree, not postgrad. See ]. --] <small>] • (])</small> 16:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC) was the wrong disambiguation. An ] is essentially a primary degree, not postgrad. See ]. --] <small>] • (])</small> 16:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

== ]: Your input requested ==

Hi, WHK-- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit ], where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input ‘’’not in support of either view,’’’ but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! ] (]) 17:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:56, 15 November 2010

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive16. Archives prior to 16 June 2007 were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.



Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Discussion invite

Also known as

Hello. On 22 October 2010, you changed the direction of the redirect page Also known as from Aka to Pseudonym with the edit summary "WikiCleaner 0.99 - Repairing link to disambiguation page - (You can help)". Redirecting pages to disambiguation pages is perfectly acceptable. If you had a reason to change the direction of the page, you should give your reasoning in the edit summary. I have reverted your edit because, in my opinion, aka is the better target for the page. Do you agree? Thank you. McLerristarr | Mclay1 09:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Error

For your notice, a small error in cleanup here. Thank you for your tirelees tireless cleanup work. AshLin (talk) 10:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Jyotirlinga's template

Please do not change the Vaidyanath link as disambig is necessary since the location is disputed. --Redtigerxyz 05:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Wow. When I was writing on your talk, you were writing on mine. --Redtigerxyz 05:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Master of Arts disambiguation

This edit was the wrong disambiguation. An Oxbridge MA is essentially a primary degree, not postgrad. See Master of Arts. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Folk etymology: Your input requested

Hi, WHK-- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit talk:Folk etymology, where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input ‘’’not in support of either view,’’’ but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! DavidOaks (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)