Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
I've re-hashed the intro to reflect mobile / tablet usage but also to make it read less like an advert to address concerns raised. If anyone has any further input or ideas please discuss.
I've re-hashed the intro to reflect mobile / tablet usage but also to make it read less like an advert to address concerns raised. If anyone has any further input or ideas please discuss.
Regards, ] (]) 13:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Regards, ] (]) 13:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
:My view is the history page needs to be slimmed down, the platform is being updated all the time which is neither feasible to track within the article (it would render it unreadable) nor is this necessary (the authors of the platform maintain this same information on an external website where interested parties can be referred to) ] (]) 13:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
I'm mostly a wikipedia inclussionist, meaning I tend to lean to the side of keeping articles rather than deleting them, and most importantlynot just deleting articles if they can be salvaged! I'm not saying that that is what's happening here, but it happens darn often, where this article may well be notable, there may be quite a few references out there, it may well meet the notability guidelines of its category (if applicable), or its unverified claims may have some sources out there -- but because nobody takes the time to fetch such information (especially deletionist admins who often have the tools, knowledge, ability and resources to find such information - but would far prefer to have less articles on Misplaced Pages). The bottom line is this: go out there, find the references. If it was on TV program or radio program - there's citation templates for those. Mentioned in a magazine or newspaper? There's templates. Published in a book? Template! And of course, published in the news somewhere on the net - find it! Take the time, or admit that the article simply doesn't meet notability yet. Rfwoolf (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I've re-hashed the intro to reflect mobile / tablet usage but also to make it read less like an advert to address concerns raised. If anyone has any further input or ideas please discuss.
Regards, mk (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
My view is the history page needs to be slimmed down, the platform is being updated all the time which is neither feasible to track within the article (it would render it unreadable) nor is this necessary (the authors of the platform maintain this same information on an external website where interested parties can be referred to) mk (talk) 13:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)