| Revision as of 17:26, 16 November 2010 editSusanne2009NYC (talk | contribs)4,765 edits →Copyvio problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:39, 16 November 2010 edit undoSusanne2009NYC (talk | contribs)4,765 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==DYK== | ==DYK== | ||
| Looks like you are nominating articles that are too short. For DYK, articles must be 1,500 characters of prose or longer. will give a character count. Copy and paste text into it and click on "calculate characters" to get a count. ] (]) 20:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | Looks like you are nominating articles that are too short. For DYK, articles must be 1,500 characters of prose or longer. will give a character count. Copy and paste text into it and click on "calculate characters" to get a count. ] (]) 20:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Copyvio problem == | |||
| Hi Susanne, I was looking through ''Peter Rabbit's Painting Book'' and I found some passages that are nearly identical or directly copied from the sources used. There may be more; please advise on the overall condition of this article and what we might do to fix it. Examples: | |||
| * Your text: "sold them enclosed in an envelope in sets of twelve at 4d." | |||
| * Lear, p. 238: "sold in an envelope in sets of twelve for 4d. | |||
| and | |||
| * Your text: "done grudgingly in response to public demand for a new book." | |||
| * Taylor, p. 136: "done rather grudgingly in response to public demand for a new book. | |||
| --] ] 17:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You don't have to notify me on these things. Just fix 'em up any way you please, send 'em to AfD, or blank the page. :) ] (]) 17:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| PS -- I'm involved in a GA review and I'm sick of it. Could you go over to '']'' and check it for copyvios so I have a good reason for getting the thing outta my hair. I think the plot may have copyvios or too close paraphrasing. Thanks! | |||
| PSS -- Could you start at the top of the GAN page and check each nominee for copyvios? This will keep new articles from contaminating the database. I'm not going to bother reviewing GANs in the future. What a headache! If you got any ideas on how I can dump the Bacon book I'd appreciate it. Thanks! :) ] (]) 17:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:39, 16 November 2010
DYK
Looks like you are nominating articles that are too short. For DYK, articles must be 1,500 characters of prose or longer. This tool will give a character count. Copy and paste text into it and click on "calculate characters" to get a count. Mjroots (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)