Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hodja Nasreddin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:45, 19 November 2010 editHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 edits that's right, wikipedia is not for everyone← Previous edit Revision as of 01:12, 22 November 2010 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits Narrowing of your topic ban: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ExamsDIRlong}} {{ExamsDIRlong}}

== Narrowing of your topic ban ==

I would support a narrowing of your topic ban to exclude all non-political topics. However, as you well know, in the Soviet Union ''everything'' was political. The problem I see is that politically motivated editors will try to add a political spin to every sentence about the Soviet Union, or even "Putinist" Russia. In fact I just happened to start working on a humorous "guide" on how it is done (see ]).

I already proposed that pre-revolutionary Russia be excluded, but I may have misunderstood the present wording.

For some problem editors in the Eastern Europe topic area a minimal topic ban would inlude ''"any content (edit, section or article) that describes or tries to describe Soviet rule in the Baltics or Eastern Europe as illegal or oppressive or communism as immoral or criminal."'' I cannot recommend that this be allied to you, as you seem to have a conflict with modern Russia.

Could you propose some similar wording for consideration, that would clearly and minimally outline the scope of your conflicts.

-- ] (]) 01:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:12, 22 November 2010

Template:ExamsDIRlong

Narrowing of your topic ban

I would support a narrowing of your topic ban to exclude all non-political topics. However, as you well know, in the Soviet Union everything was political. The problem I see is that politically motivated editors will try to add a political spin to every sentence about the Soviet Union, or even "Putinist" Russia. In fact I just happened to start working on a humorous "guide" on how it is done (see User:Petri Krohn/How to write about the Soviet Union).

I already proposed that pre-revolutionary Russia be excluded, but I may have misunderstood the present wording.

For some problem editors in the Eastern Europe topic area a minimal topic ban would inlude "any content (edit, section or article) that describes or tries to describe Soviet rule in the Baltics or Eastern Europe as illegal or oppressive or communism as immoral or criminal." I cannot recommend that this be allied to you, as you seem to have a conflict with modern Russia.

Could you propose some similar wording for consideration, that would clearly and minimally outline the scope of your conflicts.

-- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)