Revision as of 04:43, 16 February 2006

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Motions and requests by the parties

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

-Ril- banned for 1 year

1) -Ril- (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (under any account or IP) is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of one year.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

See below. Also, I don't see how the issue of SimonP's behaviour in the KJV matter (the topic of this arbitration, and the reason why it has the name it does) is in any way related to me making 6 fairly brief comments about Arbitration Clerks; i.e. this is suggestion by Phroziac is vehemently off-topic for this arbitration, and I strongly suspect it has something to do with Phroziac's religious stance. --Victim of signature fascism 21:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The incident happened in the process of filing the request for this arbitration. --Phroziac _. o º 01:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment by others:

He's constantly trolling. UninvitedCompany tried to indef ban him in August 2005, and I tried again very recently. And he's still doing exactly the same stuff he was doing on his last rfar. I see no evidence we should put up with it. --Phroziac _. o º 23:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Phroziac banned for 1 year

1) Phroziac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (under any account or IP) is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of one year.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

He's constantly blocking people in disregard for the blocking policy. Phroziac first blocked -Ril- for "being a sockpuppet of CheeseDreams" despite the fact that the arb com was on the way to rejecting the charge at the time, and has since done so. Secondly, Phroziac then blocked -Ril- for "trolling" about a particular subject that I had only made 6 comments about anywhere ever - "trolling" is not a criteria for blocking under the blocking policy, and nor is blocking people you don't like. --Victim of signature fascism 20:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Heh. You realize it's extremely hard to get someone banned for a year, even if they really are doing something that would require it? Desysopping me would be just as effective against my alleged abuse of powers. :) --Phroziac _. o º 01:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

This so ridiculous that I think my ridiculousity detector just exploded.--Sean Black 01:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Maybe we should just ban everybody for a year and come back after a nice vacation, eh? Karmafist 04:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

SimonP banned from inserting any portion of the source text of any translation of the bible into any article for 1 year

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

It neatly prevents the problem of his ignoring consensus, without preventing him editing elsewhere. It isn't a major issue, and I'm sure if it has merit then someone else would add it. --Victim of signature fascism 20:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

SimonP banned from inserting an entire chapter of the bible anywhere in wikipedia for 1 year

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

After all, we have Wikisource. --Victim of signature fascism 21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

SimonP banned from creating or un-redirecting articles about a single biblical verse

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

If it's noteworthy then other people will create them. --Victim of signature fascism 21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

SimonP banned from editing articles about a single biblical verse for 3 months

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

This is really about the POV editing, presenting opinions as fact rather than attributing them, heavily skewing the references used towards one general POV, etc. It won't prevent SimonP from editing elsewhere, and he clearly has a wide number of articles that he is interested in outside the subject since he has one of the highest non-bot edit counts in wikipedia. --Victim of signature fascism 21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Most of these should just be deleted anyway. By the way, you posted in the wrong section. --Phroziac _. o º 01:34, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: