| Revision as of 21:18, 16 February 2006 editTheonlyedge (talk | contribs)953 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 22:08, 17 February 2006 edit undoPrimeFan (talk | contribs)3,950 edits →Too complicated: Replied to TheonlyedgeNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, ] 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, ] 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. ] 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:08, 17 February 2006
Too complicated
This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)