Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Federlandese (coin): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:22, 14 December 2010 editAerobicFox (talk | contribs)2,552 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:28, 14 December 2010 edit undoKaldari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,434 edits Federlandese (coin)Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


:'''Keep''', I found book on Goths that mentions the Federlandese in it's synopsis. Besides, this is clearly not an "obvious hoax", let's not punish people who may have obscure knowledge of coins by preemptively deleting their articles.] (]) 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC) :'''Keep''', I found book on Goths that mentions the Federlandese in it's synopsis. Besides, this is clearly not an "obvious hoax", let's not punish people who may have obscure knowledge of coins by preemptively deleting their articles.] (]) 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No sources. The book above is a machine print of Misplaced Pages articles. Likely a hoax. ] (]) 22:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:28, 14 December 2010

Federlandese (coin)

Federlandese (coin) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a hoax. A google search returns only items that directly or indirectly came from this Misplaced Pages article. Had the coin been real, it would have been a highly notable subject. Alfons Åberg (talk) 20:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Keep, I found this book on Goths that mentions the Federlandese in it's synopsis. Besides, this is clearly not an "obvious hoax", let's not punish people who may have obscure knowledge of coins by preemptively deleting their articles.AerobicFox (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories: