Revision as of 15:14, 30 December 2010 editMoni3 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,282 edits →St. Johns River Water Management District: also curious← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:43, 30 December 2010 edit undo74.97.209.127 (talk) →St. Johns River Water Management DistrictNext edit → | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
Please respond here or one the article talk page. If you continue to remove cited information without a sufficient explanation of your actions, you may be blocked or banned from editing this article. --] (]) 15:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | Please respond here or one the article talk page. If you continue to remove cited information without a sufficient explanation of your actions, you may be blocked or banned from editing this article. --] (]) 15:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Moni3 is an administrator who misuses her tools to to punish those who edit "her" articles. Beware! |
Revision as of 22:43, 30 December 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Please stop personal attacks (see Misplaced Pages "No Personal Attacks").
May 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Ronald Jones (interdisciplinarian) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
St. Johns River Water Management District
If you are employed by SJRWMD, it is best to be careful when editing. Articles are not censored with information that is considered "pretty" by its management or employees. It contains all material that is germane, good, bad and indifferent. Please be aware that there is such a thing as a "discussion page" for each article, where editors may discuss improvements to the article. Student7 (talk) 22:32, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
I am likewise confused by your edits to this article. Your edits summaries , are misleading. Prescribed fires are not esoteric nor is that information redundant. What are you trying to accomplish in these edits?
Please respond here or one the article talk page. If you continue to remove cited information without a sufficient explanation of your actions, you may be blocked or banned from editing this article. --Moni3 (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Moni3 is an administrator who misuses her tools to to punish those who edit "her" articles. Beware!