| Revision as of 20:56, 9 April 2004 view sourceMartinHarper (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,927 edits =Agenda= rm - done← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:57, 9 April 2004 view source MartinHarper (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,927 editsm * The wikipedia:arbitration policy details the rules involved.Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| :"The arbitration committee can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e. basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values." | :"The arbitration committee can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e. basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values." | ||
| To request arbitration, see ]. | * To request arbitration, see ]. | ||
| * The ] details the rules involved. | |||
| == Members == | == Members == | ||
Revision as of 20:57, 9 April 2004
The arbitration committee exists to impose binding solutions to Misplaced Pages disputes. This solution may be anything up to and including a ban from editing the entire Misplaced Pages for a period of time.
The arbitration committee is the last step in the dispute resolution process - it is a last resort to be turned to when all else has failed. Other steps, including discussion between users and, where appropriate, mediation, should be tried first. The arbitration committee exists to deal with only the most serious disputes and cases of rule-breaking.
Until the beginning of 2004, Jimbo Wales dealt with serious disputes and was the only person with the authority to ban users who were not engaging in simple vandalism (straightforward vandals can be blocked by any administrator). In the last couple of months, this role has begun to be passed to the arbitration committee. Jimbo wrote:
- "The arbitration committee can impose a solution that I'll consider to be binding, with of course the exception that I reserve the right of executive clemency and indeed even to dissolve the whole thing if it turns out to be a disaster. But I regard that as unlikely, and I plan to do it about as often as the Queen of England dissolves Parliament against their wishes, i.e. basically never, but it is one last safety valve for our values."
- To request arbitration, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration.
- The arbitration policy details the rules involved.
Members
The current members of the arbitration committee are:
- Daniel Mayer, aka Maveric149 -- maveric149 at yahoo.com
- David Friedland, aka Nohat -- david at nohat.net
- Fred Bauder -- fredbaud at ctelco.net
- Gutza -- gutza at moongate.ro, but please see my notice on a temporary internet outage
- James Forrester, aka Jdforrester -- james at jdforrester.org
- Lee Pilich, aka Camembert -- lee at audiblerecords.com
- Mark, aka Delirium -- delirium at rufus.d2g.com
- Martin Harper, aka MyRedDice -- wikipedia at myreddice.co.uk
- Sean Barrett, aka The Epopt -- sean at epoptic.org
- The Cunctator -- cunctator at kband.com
All volunteered apart from The Cunctator, who was "drafted". Jimbo plans that future arbitrators will be elected. By choice, we don't have a chair.
External link
- Defunct Arbitration message board (active 21 Jan to 17 Mar 2004)