Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:28, 2 January 2011

Blocked

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In article Cernova tragedy I removed source which I did not understand - Magyar, and I keept and added english sources. Hungarian source was from magazine and written by "manager", its not scholar http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources. I did not make disruptive editing. I was bullying by Hubartimus without reasons and with Stubs99 who attacked my personal page. I agree that I made personal attack in SELF-DEFENCE and hope that this ban will short. I understand my mistake, that I have used emotion, but after provocations. --Samofi (talk) 9:03 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but your unblock request does not indicate that you understand why you have been blocked. Please write a new unblock request that discusses your behavior (not the behavior of other editors), what you did that led to a block, and how your behavior will change to avoid future disruption. TNXMan 15:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As noted at ANI, the combination of large aggressive editing with a clear POV indicates a battleground mentality that's inappropriate here. The fact that your response pointing to edits at Černová tragedy which were immediately reverted (in part, because you are obviously removing sources you don't agree with) indicates a real need to understand that purposes of Misplaced Pages is not for you to push your POV on everybody else. You can't even respond to a single point without making it an argument about authors along ethnic lines. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that he or she has abusively used one or more accounts. (Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed socks)

Decline reason:

Please don't use this template to request edits; it is only for unblocking requests. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to appeal to admins to put out my tag "

This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that he or she has abusively used one or more accounts. (Account information: block log · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed socks)

" because it unfair. I declared that IP: 78.128.181.9 its my IP in the deletion talk page of deleted article Problems of Slovak nationality in Hungarian Kingdom (sometimes I forget to log in) and user: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga its not me. So this page is POV of User:Baxter9: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:JanVarga Thank you for answer. --Samofi (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the fundamental rules of Misplaced Pages. Now I know that I made a lot of disruptions - personal attacks, POV, I was not neutral, I had bad citations. I think I can work more accurately so I would like to have a chance to continue with editing. Firstly I would like to finish my article about the Slovaks in Hungary. I will firstly discuss controversial issues than I will make bigger changes in articles. I will not make edit wars and I will contact administrator when it will be some problem. About my sock puppets I know nothing, I use internet from the router in my campus, so a lot of people can use it. I admit that sometimes I was not log in and I was editing under my IP and not my nick. So I would like to unblock my IP: User:78.128.181.9 and to perform better investigation of my sock puppets. Thank you for possible unblock. Yours truly Samofi.

Decline reason:

From all I've read below, no, it seems like WP:BATTLEFIELD was written with you in mind. --jpgordon 21:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Samofi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I undestand my ban. I agree that I was guilty. I have not used sock puppets for a significant time. In the past I was offensive, I have not read Misplaced Pages´s fundamental rules. But I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English. I understand that Misplaced Pages is not battlefield and it can exists more opinions. I would like to contribute to less controversial topics and more discuss about my edits. I think I had a enough time to understand my faults to not make it again. I would like to have a chance to edit Misplaced Pages again

Accept reason:

Well you managed to generate quite some comments here. I thank you for your replies. It appears that your English is not so bad as to cause problems - but of course you will expected to be careful, as it's not your first language. I would have asked the blocking admin User:Ricky81682 to comment, but he's not been around since July, so that's not an option. You have waited more than the "standard" six months for a block for socking without any clear evidence of any more socking, I am therefore going to assume that all your answers were true and complete and unblock. You will advised that there will be many eyes on your future edits - maybe from some on this page, so be sure to always try to follow the policies - when in doubt, don't edit, ask first - nothing here needs to be done immediately. Ronhjones  00:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

You are only allowed one account. It is thought that you have used (at least)

• User:MartinMagera
• User:Tobar888

Will you confirm / deny those and can you list any other names that you used back in the past.  Ronhjones  22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I think Samofi was honest when he rejected the sockpuppetry accusations. For example the accounts User:MartinMagera and User:JanVarga were mine... (Iaaasi (talk) 07:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC))

Maybe - but only he can confirm / deny, and "I have not used sock puppets for a significant time" - suggests he might have.  Ronhjones  16:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I have used only User:CsabaBabba and my old IP from student campus. I would like to use only this one - Samofi. User:Tobar888 was my friend from student campus I invited him to Misplaced Pages and he became of victim of several Hungarian Wikipedians because he agreed with my opinions. He was disgusted from their bullying and stopped to contribute to Misplaced Pages. And about Tobar888: "An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sock puppet of Samofi." But he is not my sockpuppet, you can check it. Thank you.

I do not think that it can be true. I am certain if User:CsabaBabba and Samofi are two different people on the ground that CsabaBabba's English is much better than that of Samofi. Perhaps it is possible that they know each other in real life but in this case CsabaBabba is a meatpuppet of Samofi. Just by reading this unblock request , everyone could see that Samofi is unable to write in English without making multiple grammatical errors with which it is impossible to contribute here constructively. However, the latest unblock request is better written regarding grammar. And in addition, it is likely that User:BBorbely also belongs to the group of CsabaBabba-Samofi and if anybody says that"I invited him to Misplaced Pages and he became of victim of several Hungarian Wikipedians because he agreed with my opinions. He was disgusted from their bullying and stopped to contribute to Misplaced Pages.", it displays a strong bettleground behaviour. --Nmate (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

I dont understand what is Nmate talking about. User CsabbaBabba was mine, I have still pasword to this account, but I will not use it coz I want be unblocked. I have written above: "I have used only User:CsabaBabba and my old IP from student campus" and Iam worth it. About my English its also written above: "I had a half year for a study of Misplaced Pages´s rules and for the studying English". About other sockpuppets I dont know, for example Iaaasi confessed that few sockpuppets of Samofi was his sockpuppets. About the imputation of strong bettleground behaviour because of Tobar888: I honestly wrote what he told me - there is no battleground, and user:Tobar888 was not certifiably as my sockpuppet.--Samofi (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, fortunately, you do not have to convince me that your unblock is auspicious. It is interesting that you accuse Hungarians of committing genocide against Slovaks under your username Samofi. Then emerge as a new user, CsabaBabba, that strongly suggests that you are of Hungarian and try to pretend that you can speak Hungarian...and if you are of Hungarian ,verily, it is even much more despicable. If I were an admin, I would never unblock you but my opinion is not of much importance here.--Nmate (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks to User:Nmate for opinions. Everyone can change and to study a new informations. I am Slovak with basic knowledge of Magyar language. I have admitted my mistakes and disruptions and changed my expression. I have not used Sockpuppets for a significant time. --Samofi (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

You may have basic understanding of the Hungarian language, but you don't have basic level English that's for sure. You should continue "to study a new informations" a lot more before even asking to be able to contribute here. Doing so is disrespectful to the other editors who would be relegated to cleaning up broken sentences if you contribute to articles. Other than that I really don't think the project would benefit from more displays of open ethnic hatred such as the case here, because they tend to generate a reaction and a then a counter-reaction to that and wikipedia is a lot worse off in the end. Hobartimus (talk) 01:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you User:Hobartimus but my English level was not a reason of my block. I have stopped with the ethnic hatred stuffs a long time ago. So Iam able to contribute to Misplaced Pages with the clean sheet again. --Samofi (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages sockpuppeteers