User talk:Ohnoitsjamie: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:46, 22 February 2006 editPschemp (talk \| contribs)Administrators20,808 edits →RE. BS. TX ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:08, 22 February 2006 edit undoPschemp (talk \| contribs)Administrators20,808 edits →RE. BS. TX Next edit →
Line 94:		Line 94:

	::Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)		::Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

			Ok, I posted one more good faith request for reasons. If this is not answered I think you may be able to moe on down the dispute resolution ladder. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 04:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:08, 22 February 2006

Welcome to Jamie's talk page!

Talk archives

October 2005 – February 9, 2006 archives

General

Vandalism

Deletion

El juego

I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article. "El juego" means "the game" in Spanish, so it's a legitimate redirect IMHO. howch e ng {chat} 00:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Football Aid

I've noticed you did an edit on Kaká back a while ago. I nominated the article at Football Aid/Article Improvement. Maybe you can help out by voting and do more edits. There are also more articles you can do and you can nominate articles yourself.Kingjeff 00:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Another Esperanzial note...

Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".

The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.

Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,
--Celestianpower 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)

OhNoItsJamie's Deletionist Bullying

Removed my redirection from the Spanish name for The Game, 'El Juego' as supposedly nonsense vandalism . Later apologises to another Misplaced Pages user saying 'I guess I was too hasty in tagging that one'...
Removes my addition that Aphex Twin (aka Richard D. James) grew up in Carharrack whilst leaving the info about his album. Which is more important, that he named a remix after it or he grew up there?
Removed etymology of skunk (cannabis) from the strain Skunk No. 1
Removed a link to my How to Skin Up Guide (Skinupperology), more informative and detailed than any of the other guides and including photos, all the other inferior links were left untouched.
Removed my link to LoseTheGame.com, from page, even though it is by far the most comprehensive Game-related website.

A look through OhNoItsJamie's contributions reveals a rampant deletionist attitude having no respect for the opinions and knowledge of others. Jonty 23:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Response I'm not the only one who has reverted your edits, most of which consisted of link spam for your losethegame.com site (your registration of that domain can be confirmed via NetworkSolutions whois). The spam warning template that's been applied to your talk page clearly states the policy regarding using Misplaced Pages to drive traffic to your site. The other edits were reverted because they were unsourced and/or unencylopedic. The info about Aphex Twin was reverted because it accompanied a spam link to your site. You're welcome to restore that information (assuming that it's verifiable). I'm sorry if you're upset that the "Pez" article of your that I nominated for deletion was removed via an afd vote (which now has been recreated with no attempt to address issues raised in the afd vote). I stand by my editing history. OhNoitsJamie 03:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Bill Clinton

Regarding your comments on my talk page. My nullyfying your edit and bringing back vandalism was an accident. While you were reverting the page, I was doing a revert of my own. However, I was accidently reverting the vandalism back, not the trusted article. Just a little error on my part. Sorry for the problem. --John / Cloud109 18:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Big Spring, Texas

Okies. Thanks. --Zsinj

Skinupperology

Why do you keep removing this link, it is more informative than any of the others you have left. Jonty 21:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Big Spring, Texas

I didn't even notice it was paraphrased. The first sentence of both paragraphs sounded very familiar and I assumed this was more stubborn editing from the same anon editor with that other ip address. Feel free to unrevert me if you think it is the right thing to do. Sorry! ApolloCreed 02:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

3rr noticeboard

Hi. I've just archived the noticeboard, including some of your reports that didn't get an answer. They are now stale, so need to be archived, but you may well have got a raw deal. If the problems continue, leave me a message next time you leave a report. Sometimes these things slip through, especially as there is no-one responsible (formally or informally) for checking that page. William M. Connolley 14:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC).

Spam

Great work reverting that anon spamming hockey pages! However, you rv'ed my category additions in the process. I partially reverted to restore them. Just thought I'd let you know. Take care. SoLando (Talk) 20:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

67.49.215.174

This is a public IP adress of my road runner cable modem. I have it hooked up to an unprotected wireless network. I live in an apartment complex. I know that some vandalism comes from this IP adress(probably from my neighbors), but I do legitimate contributions here. Could you please not block this IP? If the vandalism continues, I could possibly encrypt the network. --67.49.215.174 04:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Chonga

Chonga was an article that went through AfD a few days ago about the exact same racially stereotyping bullshit only about hispanic girls in south Florida. See here. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) – February 20, 2006, 05:01 (UTC)

VfD : Moog records

Please read and consider Talk:Moog records. -- Krash (Talk) 14:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

RE. BS. TX

Hey, Ohnoitsjamie, I'm afraid that the answer to your request for semi protection is no. SP not an option here. Unless the page is being heavily vandalized, semi protection is not applicable. For major disputes full protection can be an option. As I am rather unfamiliar with this situation, (since my protection of the article a week or so ago, I have not given much attention to it) I have the article on the CVU's watchlist in #wikipedia-en-vandalism so it is being monitored for major changes. If you would like to request protection please list it at WP:RFP. Thanks KnowledgeOfSelf 02:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

It looks to me like this guy is more in violation of WP:POINT. Try getting someone to help with that. psch e mp | talk 03:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

lol, I'm pretty sure I missed some of the reverts even with that huge list. I originally made it thinking it might be useful if RFAr comes up, but I don't think it will come to that. ~ Apollo Creed 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. psch e mp | talk 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I posted one more good faith request for reasons. If this is not answered I think you may be able to moe on down the dispute resolution ladder. psch e mp | talk 04:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:46, 22 February 2006 editPschemp (talk \| contribs)Administrators20,808 edits →RE. BS. TX ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:08, 22 February 2006 edit undoPschemp (talk \| contribs)Administrators20,808 edits →RE. BS. TX Next edit →
Line 94:		Line 94:

	::Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)		::Jamie, that anon is dangersouly close to violating 3RR. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 03:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

			Ok, I posted one more good faith request for reasons. If this is not answered I think you may be able to moe on down the dispute resolution ladder. <small>]]] \| ]</small> 04:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)