Misplaced Pages

User talk:Zweigenbaum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:15, 13 January 2011 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,267 edits WP:NPA: Please don't attack other editors.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:58, 14 January 2011 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 edits →Arbitration Request: new sectionNext edit →
Line 40: Line 40:
==WP:NPA== ==WP:NPA==
{{{icon|] }}} Please don't attack other editors. Comment on content, not on the contributor, as per WP:NPA. Misplaced Pages is not a battlefield, and your tone on ] is completely inappropriate. Example: you have recently accused an editor (Tom Reedy) of creating "a moral snakepit of prevarication that twists and skirts the guidelines for base partisan advantage." That's written as if you have no concept of the important wiki tenet of ], which states that you're expected to assume, unless or until the opposite is proven, that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. Avoid discussing the motives of others; discuss their actions and edits. If you continue to flout wiki culture and wiki policy and guidelines in your comments, not to mention ordinary ] in discourse, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. I've been cutting you some extra slack because you're a new editor, but if you wish to continue here, it's getting to be time you started to internalise our principles for civil interchange. ] | ] 06:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC). {{{icon|] }}} Please don't attack other editors. Comment on content, not on the contributor, as per WP:NPA. Misplaced Pages is not a battlefield, and your tone on ] is completely inappropriate. Example: you have recently accused an editor (Tom Reedy) of creating "a moral snakepit of prevarication that twists and skirts the guidelines for base partisan advantage." That's written as if you have no concept of the important wiki tenet of ], which states that you're expected to assume, unless or until the opposite is proven, that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. Avoid discussing the motives of others; discuss their actions and edits. If you continue to flout wiki culture and wiki policy and guidelines in your comments, not to mention ordinary ] in discourse, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. I've been cutting you some extra slack because you're a new editor, but if you wish to continue here, it's getting to be time you started to internalise our principles for civil interchange. ] | ] 06:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC).

== Arbitration Request ==

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> and if you are aware of any other parties who might be usefully added, please note them. ] (]) 23:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:58, 14 January 2011

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages

The Misplaced Pages Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Nikkimaria (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Shakespeare

Leaving aside the problems with your argument for the moment, there is no point adding views to an archived page. The debate there is over. You certainly should not add them to an article. Please familiarise yourself with Misplaced Pages policy: WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NPOV WP:FRINGE. Paul B (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Agree with Paul B, which is why I am reverting the transfer to talk page of something that has been archived. Archiving does not "hide" text - it is there in the archives for all to read. That is why it is called "archiving". But that discussion was concluded. hamiltonstone (talk) 09:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

3RR

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. I don't think you can have missed my 3RR warning on Talk:Shakespeare authorship question, but since you've ignored it, I post one here on your page as well, to make sure you see it (being a new user). Bishonen | talk 08:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC).

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 00:04, 24 December 2010 (UTC).


WP:NPA

Please don't attack other editors. Comment on content, not on the contributor, as per WP:NPA. Misplaced Pages is not a battlefield, and your tone on Talk:Shakespeare authorship question is completely inappropriate. Example: you have recently accused an editor (Tom Reedy) of creating "a moral snakepit of prevarication that twists and skirts the guidelines for base partisan advantage." That's written as if you have no concept of the important wiki tenet of assuming good faith, which states that you're expected to assume, unless or until the opposite is proven, that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. Avoid discussing the motives of others; discuss their actions and edits. If you continue to flout wiki culture and wiki policy and guidelines in your comments, not to mention ordinary civility in discourse, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. I've been cutting you some extra slack because you're a new editor, but if you wish to continue here, it's getting to be time you started to internalise our principles for civil interchange. Bishonen | talk 06:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC).

Arbitration Request

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Shakespeare authorship question and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, and if you are aware of any other parties who might be usefully added, please note them. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)