Misplaced Pages

Coral Consortium: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:53, 21 January 2011 editGeitost (talk | contribs)352 edits copyright violation (since first version) removed, see talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 11:26, 21 January 2011 edit undoPratyeka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,789 edits External links: +categories (2x)Next edit →
Line 56: Line 56:
* *


]
{{Uncategorized|date=December 2010}}
]

Revision as of 11:26, 21 January 2011

The Coral Consortium was founded in Fall 2004 by Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Intertrust Technologies Corporation, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Panasonic), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Sony Corporation and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Membership

Coral distinguishes between Promoter and Contributor members.

Promoter Members

Contributor Members

Concept

Coral proposes an architecture whereby devices using different DRM technologies are able to join a Domain that allows them to exchange protected content securely. A device used by a family member wishing to play a music file that is stored on another family-owned device can use Coral to obtain a new copy (or license) in the correct format, with the Coral infrastructure managing the necessary permissions and translation of rights to the new device. In theory this should greatly ease the portability of protected media files between devices.

Additional Information

Much of the Coral documentation requires the reader to agree to legal conditions, so it is not very easy for most members of the public to examine the proposals. However there is a fairly full FAQ document available (Coral Consortium FAQ Document).

Possible Limitations

While Coral is a novel approach to DRM interoperability, doubts have been raised in some quarters as to whether it is really suitable for all media types.

  • The approach of obtaining a second file protected under the second DRM system assumes that such a file is available, and also assumes that both DRM vendors (and service providers) will cooperate with Coral. At the time of writing, Apple is not a Coral member company.
  • The Coral membership leans heavily to music companies; other content types (e.g. video, TV, games) are not so strongly represented.
  • The bandwidth requirements (and download delay) for obtaining a second copy of a large file such as an HD TV broadcast are considerable.
  • Some Europeans have expressed concerns over consumer privacy and anonymity, if all such content moves involve a "phone home" to a Coral service in the cloud.

References

  1. "Coral Member Companies".

External links

Categories: