Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:35, 25 February 2006

User talk:Essjay/Sandbox2
User:Essjay/Header
User talk:Essjay/Top User:Essjay/Directory

Big Spring, Texas

Wow. Quite an RFC, eh? Happyjoe appears to be using anonymizing proxies to hit the page from IPs all over the world; do you think semiprotection is in order? Thanks for your help. OhNoitsJamie 07:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Great minds think alike; I just sprotected it. If you catch any other socks, tag them as {{sockpuppet|Ohnoitsjayme}} so everything will match. Hopefully, now that he can't edit the RfC, he'll go away, but if not, we have plenty of people around to block him. Essjay 07:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Since I was prevented from responding to the RFC, due to those who wished to suppress my response with unwarranted accusations, I had no choice but to use any means necessary in order to insure that I was able to adequately respond to the RFC. It is a shame that there are those who prefer to squelch discussion on this issue. Happyjoe 69.145.215.206 06:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Proxies

Ah yes, I wasn't aware that was actually a proxy. I'm very curious...how did you know I blocked that address? You must be sitting somewhere with a monitor open...I think you can double to be a computer engineer as well? :-) --129.97.229.23 10:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I assume you're HappyCamper logged out; yeah, I'm watching that page, since it's become a list of open proxies. I'm scanning them as I see them and blocking them indef. Essjay 10:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

86.10.231.219 blocking

You blocked the above user. Can you supply the page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, you mentioned? I am curious about these sort of trangressions, and was observing his actions, so would like to see the examples. Thanks. john 11:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Removing comments from AN/I, as well as his harassment of User:Thsgrn. Essjay 11:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

The block you have imposed is unwarranted at best, and not at all conducive to resolving the root problem, which is the suppression of content on a number of medical articles by users who constantly push the edge of the envelope. Please consider taking a less authoritarian approach to resolving the matter, rather than condoning the problematic behavior of those who relentlessly dismantle content that does not strictly adhere to the dogma of medical orthodoxy. Ombudsman 12:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I suggest you raise the issue on AN/I; I stand behind my block of an IP address that was caught redhanded removing commentary from AN/I and harassing other contributors. Essjay 12:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you please provide a link specifically of the alleged deletion? You have removed a valid notice board posting and deleted relevant discussion from the anon's talk page, so it seems that you have engaged in exactly the kind of behavior that you describe as 'red handed'. Your unilateral decision to block the anon clearly takes sides with editors engaged in a wide ranging, disruptive campaign to delete broad swaths of content, contributed to provide reasonable balance to a number of medical articles. An example of the type of imbalance that is being enforced can be observed at the anti-vaccinationists article, an ill-conceived distraction that has been proffered as a subsitute for the deleted vaccine critics article. Your recent entry into this larger debate would be more welcome if you would use your admin privileges in a more even handed manner. Ombudsman 13:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Neoconservatism - My confusion

Hi. Sorry for my confusion, I will take your advice. Thanks. Enjoy your long weekend. --Cberlet 13:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Undelete

Hi, cloud you get this undeleted? Your and administrator, and I don't know who else to turn to. The Republican 20:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, it got undeleted. The Republican 22:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Association of Members Advocates

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Association_of_Members%27_Advocates This is the mediation group I am involved with. Not yours. The mediation advice I gave was an INFORMAL MEDIATION ONLY, the first level of mediation. See Misplaced Pages: Conflict Resolution. Cameronian 10:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Have fun!

Hey Essjay, enjoy your trip, make sure it is a safe one! KnowledgeOfSelf 12:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Psst

Check out this page. Pass it along. Nudge nudge. -- evrik 17:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Hello, Essjay. I was referred to you by Thames because you are currently mediating a dispute over the Neoconservatism article. I also have issues with Jacrosse concerning the French Turn and Max Shachtman articles, and I have requested mediation for the former. I'm not sure if you'd want take on mediation considering your previous experience with the Neoconservativism dispute, but I thought I'd give you a heads-up. Thanks --metzerly 18:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

wow

I'm new on wikipedia. I can make an article, and add links and pictures--but thats it. From seeing your talk page, irealize you really know what you're doing. Could you tell me if there's a page about how to get started (aside from all the introduction pages, which I already know.

Thanks, Theonlyedge 00:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)