Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:52, 25 February 2006

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

• M:Foundation issues
• Misplaced Pages:Tutorial
• Misplaced Pages:Cleanup resources
• Misplaced Pages:Help desk
• Misplaced Pages:Five pillars

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

Dear ShervinK!

In fact this map shows the areas that kurdish language by its various dialects is spoken; During the centuries many kurdish tribes have been exiled or forced to migrate to difference parts of middle east. But actually Kurdistan is only the bigger part which is in south-east Turkey, northern Iraq, east and north-west Iran and north-east Syria; and not the former Soviet, northern Khorasan... although there surely do live many kurds so that in northern khorasan "Ghouchan" is a kurdish speaking city. I have many kurdish friends in those small areas out of The Great Kurdistan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mezopotamia (talk • contribs) 17:58, 1 October 2005.

Signing

Greetings! Just noticed your efforts to keep Mohammad_Reza_Pahlavi NPOV, well done. A reminder to sign all your talk page comments, like the warning to User:219.93.174.105. Keep up the good work!--inks 07:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Also, don't forget to use edit summaries, even when you're in a hurry. :) --inks 00:42, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Mohammad Reza Pahlavi

Hi Shervin! I asked some Admins to help us stop vandalism, I look forward to get rid out of 219.93.174.105 soon! --Sina 14:15, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Mohammed Mossadegh

Greetings, Shervink. Thanks for writing. The statement that the takeover was "legally legitimate" is a legal opinion that is certainly disputed by many parties. The U.S. National Security council, for instance, referred to the takeover as a "coup" back in 1952.. Nearly every reputable book on the subject refers to the event using this term (although a few, as you know, dispute the charicterization), and nearly every reputable newspaper uses the term "coup" to describe the event. Certainly one could make a case that the takeover was "legally legitimate", but one could also make the case that the takeover was "illegal and immoral", and neither interpretation should be stated as fact in Misplaced Pages. Our neutral point of view policy says that when there is significant controversy over a statement, that statement should not be stated as fact; instead the article should say who believes the statement and who disputes it. So it would be better to have a section called "the legality of the coup" or somesuch that list which researchers believe the takeover was illegal, and which believe it was legal, and the reasons given for each. Regards, – Quadell 20:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Mohammad Reza Pahlavi

Hi Shervink. I suggest that, since our views have been pretty much covered at the talk page, we communicate directly through each others user talk pages instead so as not the clutter the Mohammad Reza Pahlavi talk page any futher. Do you agree ? ---- Melca 00:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

CONGRATULATIONS!

With much satisfaction have i read your contributions to the Mohammad Reza PAHLAVI article! I am impressed with the way you handle the onslaught of brainwashed populistic media victims who simply quote some publications, unreflectedly and without own comprehension, trying to keep information on this platform "mainstream" instead of factual! Thank you for fighting errate falsification attempts by young, overzealous ignorami or, halfwitts opposed to the pahlavi regime, who (metaphorically foaming from the mouth) attempt to contort history, to suit their fancy.Pantherarosa 01:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• • • • • • Hi Shervink, in response to your kind message: I don't have harsh words, as a matter of fact, for critics of the PAHLAVI regime per se (I have a considerable amount of criticism myself visavis the latter). All I refer to is THOSE CRITICS who post POV here , guided by hatred or other unhelpful sentiments, as that is not what WIKIPEDIA strives to offer the public that looks here for encyclopedic entries. Pantherarosa 01:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

با درود و عرض خسته‌ نباشید. خواستم خدمت شما برسانم که‌ با گذاشتن چند واژه‌ سام ویا موست نمیتوان جلو تجزیه‌ کردستان را گرفت. در کردستان هم ملیگرا وجود دارد هم تجزیه طلب. تنها تجزیه‌ طلبها برای خود هویت آرایی و اصیل تعین میکنند و حتی خون فارسها را کثیف و غیر آریایی مینامند و. خود را وارثین برحق و مظلوم امپراطوری ماد مینامند. لطفا این قدر سر این واژه وقت خودتان را ضایع نکنید.

با تشکر از مشارکتهای شما در ویکیپدیا. با سپاس. پاینده ‌باشید. Diyako Talk + 18:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Heja Helweda, Diyako, Aucaman

These three users are on some sort of anti-Iranian crusade vandalizing all the Iranian and Persian related articles. We need to keep an eye on their " edit activities" as their intentions is not sincere but merely for the purpose of propagating false information.