Revision as of 06:55, 4 February 2011 editShadowmorph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,792 edits →Neutrality & other issues: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 07:15, 4 February 2011 edit undoShadowmorph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,792 editsm →Neutrality & other issuesNext edit → |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
== Neutrality & other issues == |
|
== Neutrality & other issues == |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are just some of the articles problems: |
|
Here are just some of the article's problems: |
|
*missing a great deal of surrounding history |
|
*missing a great deal of surrounding history |
|
*section titles are non-neutral |
|
*section titles are non-neutral |
|
*characterizations |
|
*characterizations |
|
*place names are presented without to wikipedia naming policies |
|
*place names are presented without regard to Misplaced Pages naming policies |
|
*The role Serbian kings is cut to fit the tone of the page. The fact that they are serbian is misrepresented, or not shown at all. |
|
*The role of Serbian kings is cut to fit the tone of the page. The fact that they are Serbs is misrepresented, or not shown at all. |
|
*Any Greek element is absent. Magic wand style vanished. This is certainly due to the page originally being written as a history of the former Yugoslav & now independent, Republic of Macedonia, in a historical period where that cannot be defined as that. Thus the major congusion! |
|
*Any Greek element is absent. Magic-wand-style vanished. This is certainly due to the page originally being written as a history of the former Yugoslav & now independent, Republic of Macedonia, in a historical period where that cannot be defined as that. Thus the major confusion! |
|
] <sup>]</sup> 06:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
] <sup>]</sup> 06:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC) |
The map accompanying the article is somewhat confusing. The borders are (almost) present-day borders, not borders at Ottoman times, and according to the byline, the hatched area forms an entity whereas the article says that there was no Macedonian entity, but three vilayets. Can someone clarify this? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)