| Revision as of 21:42, 9 February 2011 editPassionless (talk | contribs)3,461 edits →The Signpost: 7 February 2011← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:12, 10 February 2011 edit undoTamara Zion (talk | contribs)360 edits QwerpQwertus adopted me and I'm happy with him so no problem.Next edit → | ||
| Line 348: | Line 348: | ||
| <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 01:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</div> | <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 01:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)</div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0107 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0107 --> | ||
| ==Adoptee== | |||
| Hi, your adoptee ], has changed accounts a few times, now being at both ] and ]. I adopted her before I realized she had previous accounts with an adopter. I was hoping you would contact her and that you would continue to be her adopter, and that I could unadopt her and get a new adoptee. ] ] 21:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:12, 10 February 2011
| Table Of Contents |
|---|
Aditi Shankardass
User:Martinjonson/Aditi_Shankardass
Hi QwerpQwertus!
You may not recall, but a few months ago you were kind enough to assist me when I created my first article, and then also approved it when I moved it to the article space. I have now created another article about neuroscientist Aditi Shankardass and was hoping you could have a quick look at it before I move it to the main article space today?
Thank you for your input, as always!
Martinjonson (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good, but you should be careful to maintain a disinterested and neutral tone - avoiding opinions like prestigious, renowned, and celebrated. Very interesting though, and good sources too! ~ QwerpQwertus Talk ツ 23:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi again!
Thank you for those suggestions, which I have incorporated. I have now moved the article into the main article space where it awaits review, so when you have a moment could I trouble you to have another quick look? Thanks again for all your time and input!
Martinjonson (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Adoption request
Hello QwerpQwertus.
I am very new to the site, Misplaced Pages and have been encountering all manner of difficulty building my article on my subject. In particular I'm stuck at citations, references, notability and image uploads. I have been directed to the adopt process. My subject is a currently active person, an artist/author/multi media individual. As such I have in mind that I would care to continue building on him as he progresses in his varied careers. My issues are with following...the, to me, confusing directives and multiple pages out there that I am sent to for guidelines etc. At this stage quite frankly I'm flummoxed! Any help?
Thanks in advance for any consideration.
--Eggs Aldo (talk) 13:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to adopt you. For your article, this one I presume, I would first reccommend adding reliable third party references that will prove the subject's notability(importance, why deserve to be in an encyclopedia) and the article's accuracy. For a quick internet reference, you can use the following code.
<ref></ref>
Example:
<ref></ref>
Put it next to a statement it supports.
QwerpQwertus is a user on Misplaced Pages.<ref></ref>
And in the references section, it will appear (due to the {{Reflist}} placed there)
QwerpQwertus is a user on Misplaced Pages.
References
(This is automatic)
- Also, you should try to maintain a disinterested and encyclopedic tone, avoiding an overly positive attitude towards the subject. As for uploads, it may be best if you decide what you want to upload first, and then I can explain how that works. The many guidelines can be very confusing, so if you have any more questions, feel free to ask! ~ QwerpQwertus Talk ツ 23:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you QwerpQuertus,
I have now asked another party to follow the adoption advice (on my behalf) that you've laid out for me as I feel they will be more on the ball with these directives and they are professionally computer literate. This should ensure that I'm not riding your back continualy over the next days! Smile. For my part I will also redress sections of text that may still read as gushing. It will be far easier for me to work backwards as in third party endorsements of Jarrette's nominations for Outstanding Brightonian for the work he has done to help the community that he resides in currently. Would the committe head or the founder of the awards be suitable as the third party?I feel I was losing my way as I was pointededly critisised early doors by a Misplaced Pages editor peer for so many things including my refering to archived articles. It was questioned whether these articles were archived because they were "not published" when in fact it clearly stated in copy that indeed all archived work had been published and as in the case of the England's Prince Philip, the Queen's husband, the article was actually vetted by the Royal Family's aides. In fact that very Misplaced Pages editor claimed not to have completed reading the article as it "made his skin crawl". So I mentioned, again, at the top of the section that "all archived articles have been published" to rectify this and again it led to a bit more muddiness in layout I'm afraid. As in Jarrette's nationality. Thank you for correcting this but he remains a citezen of the UK and Trinidad and Tobago. This was always stated clearly in the final content of the article. Trinidad and Tobago is a dual island nation and it would be preferred that it was listed as such at the top. If it is to remain as it is, now corrected from Trinidad-American (which Jarrette is not) then it should also list his resindence in Sweden where he too held residency. So you see, I feel that the editors did not read but scanned my content before making their direct and damning remarks on the subject. Likewise their geopolitical knowledge is perhaps lacking as in the case of simply listing Trinidad on its own. This can be a touchy subject amongst that country's nationals. I would not care to cause offense to Jarrette and others. I felt as though there were too many seemingly biased or indifferent editors weighing in with negative opinions on a subject they knew nothing about and cared even less for. I sincerely began to consider going no further as I hold, as many do, this subject in high regard hence my desire to represent him here. Jarrette uses his profile and connections to help up and coming people himself these days in all walks of life and continuosly works at no charge as a presenter and host of events both large and small to raise monies for various charities associated with an assortment of businesses. A number of journalists, authors and columnists as equally unfamiliar with the workings of Misplaced Pages but au fait with the work of editors, who have been helping me to put this together were actually affronted by the vicious tone of some of my feedback. Perhaps this is a cultural grammar difference thing between the UK and the USA? One tends not to say "couldn't give a rat's ass..." over this way. You must laugh. Fair enough and enough of my complaining. I've digressed. Would it serve the article if I were to include the names or details, whathaveyou, of Jarrette's more accessible (current) editors/MD's that he works(ed) closely with? Would they be considered reliable and viable third party? Sorry for my vent here on your talk page. Apologies now if I've been inapropriate. I'll try too not to strain your generosity of time with me.
Best today,
--Eggs Aldo (talk) 11:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
QwerpQwertus,
I've tried to do something, I'm sure it is wrong but the photographer Graham Franks has a website which I replaced citation need with and made it bold. Is this right? Likewise I think Tim C. Richardson has one. It is www.image-catcher.co.uk
Now citation needed for Jarrette's surgeon Grandfather, passed in late 1950's. I am trying to obtain a hospital with which he would've been closely affiliated in the West Indies as he travelled as needed to several island's capitals to tend to serious surgeries. This fact was included as Jarrette was born into a rather well off highly mobile family. Perhaps these backround details are irrelevant but I feel it goes a long way to show that he was well provided for from the beginning. This sets up his abilities to succeed and develop his talents unlike those who may have been less fortunate. I believe he, the Grandfather was trained at Edinburg University in Scotland England and am awaiting confirmation of this. Also, next to one school, Mertopolitan a private high school that he went to ( no longer there but was until the very early 80's I think)it says "who?" What is required here? Jarrette was given a certificate stating he was "most likely to succeed" on his graduation. Now, what would I replace "citation need" with in that instance? Next to his first Art show mention at La Galleria it asks "where?" That was an art gallery, La Galleria in St.louis Mo. I'm not sure of the suburb. It was curated by a one Betty Rogers. He had his first one man show there which did well and the local CBS affiliate KMOX TV did a news feature on him as a role model for teens and up and coming artist. How do I sort out the citation needed request there (up and coming artist)? Do I insert a website for the TV station or what?
What would I replace "citation needed" with when it says he landed high profile jobs in Manhattan fashion magazines (well they were national magazines)? There is a full list of nationally circulated US and international magazines straight after that claim starting with Mademoiselle. Would a website be needed for each and everyone? Eventually I thought some images of the actual pages with his editorial illustrations, press releases, interviews, and news paper features on him, his works and his exhibitions would go someway too, graphically/visually to establish his credibility on the page. Am I wrong in this assumption?
Okay. Sorry to ask these questions. I see that there are scads more claims that can be varified, hopefully to your standards, that have yet to be flagged one way or another. I have spoken to some of his editors who are happy to be third party for him. It is my belief that all involved, if still alive will be happy to represent him and I will attempt to see what I can do to acquire citation details for the more elusive items/people/companies etc that he has worked with over the decades.
--Eggs Aldo (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Misplaced Pages and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Another Adoption request
This greeting is for QwerpQwertus!
I'm a writer and legitimate journalist whose work depends on investigative research and reliable sources. At Misplaced Pages, however, I'm only a rookie and need adoption! After considering all the editors available, you would be an ideal choice.
Among my plans is the creation of an article for author Marjorie Holmes. Her trilogy based on the birth and life of Jesus Christ remains popular, although controversial. Now that Robert Sterling & Karla Worley have created a musical based upon "Two From Galilee," it seems timely for Marjorie Holmes to be included on Misplaced Pages.
Please consider adopting me too. Even if you don't, your advice certainly would be appreciated! :)
PURRfectly Perfect (talk) 17:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to help and adopt you, I'm afraid I'll have to respond tomorrow though - very busy at the moment. ~ QwerpQwertus Talk ツ 06:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- If she is WP:notable enough - you can start it as a WP:Userspace draft, at User:PURRfectly Perfect/Marjorie Holmes. WP:Your first article may help you. When writing about people, remember to maintain a neutral and disinterested tone and cite statements to prove its accuracy and the subject's WP:Notability. :) ~ QwerpQwertus Talk ツ 18:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- If she is WP:notable enough, there's sufficient information available to provide reliable citations for an accurate biography. :) Thanks very much for adopting me! PURRfectly Perfect (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- If she is WP:notable enough - you can start it as a WP:Userspace draft, at User:PURRfectly Perfect/Marjorie Holmes. WP:Your first article may help you. When writing about people, remember to maintain a neutral and disinterested tone and cite statements to prove its accuracy and the subject's WP:Notability. :) ~ QwerpQwertus Talk ツ 18:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
GOCE elections
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
  Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Misplaced Pages; Al Jazeera interview; be like Misplaced Pages
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Adoptee has good news!
QwerpQwertus,
Hello from your adoptee PURRfectly Perfect. My biography for Marjorie Holmes is now on Misplaced Pages Marjorie Holmes. Would love if you will read it over and leave me some feedback on my talk page. PurrS | (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Misplaced Pages?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
GOCE Year-end Report
Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
 We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report.
– Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete Requests for Feedback??
Hello. I just saw a recent conversation you had with Christopher Connor about submitting articles for deletion based on their presence in the Request for Feedback page.
On a different note, can I request that a feedback request be deleted? I stumbled, I admit it. I moved too fast and my request is messed up. It is actually the very first request for the new year 2011.
Can you, or do you know someone who can, delete the improper request that I made?
Netherstar (talk) 06:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Misplaced Pages as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
KDFC
Going public. See their web site. The KDFC-FM page will need changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.60.28.251 (talk) 03:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Misplaced Pages; brief news
- In the news: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited; Misplaced Pages still failing to fail; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Misplaced Pages and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News