| Revision as of 02:47, 26 February 2006 editSplash (talk | contribs)33,425 editsm Reverted edits by 210.8.228.69 (talk) to last version by Bryan Derksen← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:41, 27 February 2006 edit undo136.186.1.118 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *Also see ] for related discussion | *Also see ] for related discussion | ||
| *See ] for three past ] discussions on whether this article should have been deleted. | *See ] for three past ] discussions on whether this article should have been deleted. | ||
| *External link: | |||
| ---- | |||
| :'''Result of RfAr''': ''In the month of July, 2005, a request for arbitration was left open concerning this article. Both sides were allowed to express their viewpoints. Afterwards, the arbitrators made the following comments. Please leave this section here for reference; any changes will be removed.'' | |||
| * Accept ] July 7, 2005 22:39 (UTC) | |||
| * Accept ] 23:08, 9 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Accept ] ] 17:32, 12 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Comment: I'm not sure you need the ArbCom to tell you what to do with an incoherent POV-pushing anon ... - ] 10:05, 21 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject. As David, this is not a situation where you need arbitration. Just block as needed -- ] ] 16:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject - Concur with David, shoot on sight, no arbcom needed. ] 17:26, July 22, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject, agree with David. ] ] 18:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject. Feel free to block on sight. You don't need our permission. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:43, July 22, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| '''For those who haven't been following the discussion...''' A mostly anon user, referred to as TimeCubeGuy, frequently reverts pages to some variant of this version . The "unofficial" result of the above ArbCom (the case was rejected on grounds that the user was a simple troll/crank) was to shoot this user's edits on sight: that is, if you see the page resembling the page referenced above, it is considered '''vandalism''' and should be reverted. | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 45: | Line 29: | ||
| :I am pretty sure it's the same guy. He has been active for years on various Time Cube forums...I can't think of anyone else who has gone to such length to comprehend Time Cube.] 18:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | :I am pretty sure it's the same guy. He has been active for years on various Time Cube forums...I can't think of anyone else who has gone to such length to comprehend Time Cube.] 18:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I see that Cheradenine has visited the . This version includes a . Kosebamse has already expressed a desire to suppress this new website—for as we all know, Time Cube is ineffable truth. | ::I see that Cheradenine has visited the . This version includes a . Kosebamse has already expressed a desire to suppress this new website—for as we all know, Time Cube is ineffable truth. | ||
| == Xiphoris == | == Xiphoris == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 36: | ||
| -- ] 19:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | -- ] 19:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :It's definitely serious, Xiphoris; but UNLIKE scientology, Time Cube is a rationally proven fact. I suggest that you view the sites and . You must seek Time Cube! | :It's definitely serious, Xiphoris; but UNLIKE scientology, Time Cube is a rationally proven fact. I suggest that you view the sites and . You must seek Time Cube! | ||
| == Interesting coincidence? == | == Interesting coincidence? == | ||
| Line 75: | Line 59: | ||
| ] 04:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | ] 04:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Actually, LuminaryJanitor, it's not a joke, but rather is a rationally proven fact. I hardly think that should be viewed as an "insane" site; rather, it is quite well-thought-out and rational. Dr Gene Ray is not delusional nor schizophrenic, but rather, highly intelligent, and indeed the greatest thinker and wisest human. Learn to know Time Cube! | :::Actually, LuminaryJanitor, it's not a joke, but rather is a rationally proven fact. I hardly think that should be viewed as an "insane" site; rather, it is quite well-thought-out and rational. Dr Gene Ray is not delusional nor schizophrenic, but rather, highly intelligent, and indeed the greatest thinker and wisest human. Learn to know Time Cube! | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Line 97: | Line 81: | ||
| Just saw that today. Then had an epileptic fit from viewing the site. (God, that never gets old.) --Jack (]) 01:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC) | Just saw that today. Then had an epileptic fit from viewing the site. (God, that never gets old.) --Jack (]) 01:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| -------- | -------- | ||
| out of curiosity, how would you disprove the claim on the article? It's in all liklihood perfectly true given the givens. The problem is the givens make no sense. ] 06:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | out of curiosity, how would you disprove the claim on the article? It's in all liklihood perfectly true given the givens. The problem is the givens make no sense. ] 06:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:41, 27 February 2006
Previous discussions:
- Archive 1 (includes mathematical discussion about -1*-1=+1)
- Archive 2
- Archive 3 (Kosebamse's anti-Cubic crusade)
- Archive 4 (cleanup discussion)
- Archive 5 (Andrewa vs. TIME CUBE)
- Archive 6 (Editing dispute)
- Archive 7
- Archive 8
- Archive 9 (Archived arbitration.)
- Archive 10 (Proposed trimmed article)
- Archive 11
- Archive 12
- Also see Talk:Gene Ray for related discussion
- See Talk:Time Cube/Delete for three past AFD discussions on whether this article should have been deleted.
- External link: Time Cube forum
Time Cube Guy
For those of us that have argued with Time Cube Guy and wondered whether he's serious or just trolling, he now has a video of himself on his website:
Judge for yourself. At the very least its interesting to finally see and hear the guy who was once causing so much trouble here. Cheradenine 05:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- How do we know it's Time Cube Guy? Besides that... I think I just got a bit more confused as to whether or not this guy is serious. — Ambush Commander 17:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure it's the same guy. He has been active for years on various Time Cube forums...I can't think of anyone else who has gone to such length to comprehend Time Cube.King Mob 18:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- I see that Cheradenine has visited the new version of Cubic Awareness Online. This version includes a full, undeniable proof of Time Cube. Kosebamse has already expressed a desire to suppress this new website—for as we all know, Time Cube is ineffable truth.
Xiphoris
I'm just wondering ... is the Time Cube stuff actually supposed to be serious (like, say, Scientology) or is it pinnacle of a well-done Internet Troll? -- Xiphoris 19:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- It's definitely serious, Xiphoris; but UNLIKE scientology, Time Cube is a rationally proven fact. I suggest that you view the sites Time Cube and Cubic Awareness Online. You must seek Time Cube!
Interesting coincidence?
In Tarot MythoMorphic architecture, the only way to resolve the Disparity of the 40 minor arcana sites with the 10 sefirot is to multiply the tree into four worlds. This is done via an esoteric configuration of geometries involving both the flower of life pattern and "Metatrons cube." This fits very well with the four quarter elemental theory of Tarot, and assorted wheel of the year myths, which Tarot is almost certainly based on.
Some few of the things this guy has to say make him sound like a clairvoyant that is randomly picking up extremely esoteric information and then blending that into stream of consciousness BS.
He probably does just need one person who could understand him. Prometheuspan 04:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- or thorazine. - Nunh-huh 04:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- People do understand it... and the scary thing is that they're not delusional schizophrenic crackpots like Gene Ray. I'd have to say that the guy who runs Cubic Awareness Online probably understands it better than anyone (even Gene himself, despite the fact that he is apparently "the Wisest Human"), and defends it vehemently on the official forum. But I'm convinced it's just an elaborate joke... Just take a look at his forum avatar. You can tell he's not really serious about it - he's trying too hard to look insane. --LuminaryJanitor 10:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_qdr=all&q=metatron%27s+cube&spell=1 just visited the site. Yeah, this guys stuff is straight out of Esoteric Judaism. Its been well recoded, but its not even original material. lol. Prometheuspan 04:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, LuminaryJanitor, it's not a joke, but rather is a rationally proven fact. I hardly think that Cubic Awareness Online should be viewed as an "insane" site; rather, it is quite well-thought-out and rational. Dr Gene Ray is not delusional nor schizophrenic, but rather, highly intelligent, and indeed the greatest thinker and wisest human. Learn to know Time Cube!
Self-reference
Has anyone noticed that timecube.com now includes:
Opposite sexes created you. Ignorance of the Time Cube, Life Cube & Ineffable Truth Cube, indicts you Stupid. Ignoring Cubic Creation indicts you evil. Singularity God impossible. Misplaced Pages allowing the educated stupid to evaluate the 4 simultaneous 24 hr. days within a single rotation of Earth, equates allowing atheist to proof-read the bible.
William M. Connolley 21:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Just saw that today. Then had an epileptic fit from viewing the site. (God, that never gets old.) --Jack (Cuervo) 01:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
out of curiosity, how would you disprove the claim on the article? It's in all liklihood perfectly true given the givens. The problem is the givens make no sense. 24.5.125.232 06:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Racial Claims
"Sunup represents Indian Race; Midday represents White Race; Sundown represents Asian Race; Midnight represents Black Race."
According to The Racial State (Cambridge University Press), page 24, this idea was postulated by Carl Gustav Carus (1789-1869), only the "sundown" & "sunup" races are reversed, at least according to my reference. To him it states, this categorization reflected their different amounts of "inner illumination". Nagelfar 13:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)